It may be a duplicate of #19708, although I marked it as related.
Juha
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Martin Frb wrote:
There is a bug report, where the user says he gets this error.
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=27003#c79020
He may not have the latest Lazarus, and he still has to report his fpc
version, but terminal detection does not seem to have changed that
On Sun, 9 Nov 2014 10:18:11 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
[...]
What is there to look at ?
There must be one of the 8 (!) supported terminal programs in the path.
The error message indicates that there is no such program.
You can't get more clear than that,
On 09/11/14 11:00, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I'm curious. Why does fpc need a terminal?
The indentation in fcl-process/src/unix/process.inc is a bit confusing,
but at first sight it's only required if poNewConsole is specified
(which is logical).
Jonas
On Sun, 09 Nov 2014 12:12:16 +0100
Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be wrote:
On 09/11/14 11:00, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I'm curious. Why does fpc need a terminal?
The indentation in fcl-process/src/unix/process.inc is a bit confusing,
but at first sight it's only required if
In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said:
The indentation in fcl-process/src/unix/process.inc is a bit confusing,
but at first sight it's only required if poNewConsole is specified
(which is logical).
Yes, that's logical.
It seems Martin thinks that the compiler needs a terminal.
On 09/11/2014 11:25, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Yes, that's logical.
It seems Martin thinks that the compiler needs a terminal. Why
does the compiler use poNewConsole?
It is about starting the debugger (if I read the issue correct).
And actually, this is very old code, and has not been
On 09/11/2014 09:18, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
What is there to look at ?
There must be one of the 8 (!) supported terminal programs in the
path. The error message indicates that there is no such program. You
can't get more clear than that, I would think ?
Well to me this error says,
In our previous episode, Martin Frb said:
path. The error message indicates that there is no such program. You
can't get more clear than that, I would think ?
Well to me this error says, this is the current supported list, probably
because this are all known (common) terminals at the
On Sun, 9 Nov 2014, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Martin Frb said:
path. The error message indicates that there is no such program. You
can't get more clear than that, I would think ?
Well to me this error says, this is the current supported list, probably
because this
There is a bug report, where the user says he gets this error.
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=27003#c79020
He may not have the latest Lazarus, and he still has to report his fpc
version, but terminal detection does not seem to have changed that much
within 2.6.x.
I did ask him for
11 matches
Mail list logo
