Von: Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be
Gesendet: So 03.05.2009 15:01
An: FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org;
Betreff: Re: [fpc-devel] On code cleanup
On 03 May 2009, at 14:58, Alexander Klenin wrote:
BTW, is generics good enough to be used in e.g. math.pp?
Afaik
On 03 May 2009, at 04:28, Alexander Klenin wrote:
While fixing http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13619,
Jonas did not apply neither code cleanup not comment fix parts of it.
It's mainly because I saw the patch only after I already looked up the
Delphi declaration and fixed the code
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
I'm not sure. But if they should be done, now would probably be a good
time given that merging from trunk to fixes is already fairly hard
anyway (at least for the compiler), and I don't really see a 2.2.6
happening (although I'm sure other
On 03 May 2009, at 13:08, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 3 May 2009, Jonas Maebe wrote:
I don't see what the problem is with stabilising/releasing 2.4 as
it is. If
generics and Delphi 2009-style ansistrings are not going to get
finished any
time soon, why not release 2.4 without them
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
(I don't think the situation with 2.2.6 changed from the one with
2.2.4. I
don't see a 2.4 release within the year happening.
I don't see what the problem is with stabilising/releasing 2.4 as it
is. If generics and Delphi 2009-style
On 03 May 2009, at 12:44, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Well, Lazarus is currently amassing large handcoded UTF8 ansistring
codebases, something I don't think that is healthy. If unicode is
postponed
to the next major release, it will be long, very long before this is
cleaned
up.
Waiting
On Sun, 3 May 2009, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 03 May 2009, at 11:30, Marco van de Voort wrote:
(I don't think the situation with 2.2.6 changed from the one with 2.2.4. I
don't see a 2.4 release within the year happening.
I don't see what the problem is with stabilising/releasing 2.4 as it
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
Well, Lazarus is currently amassing large handcoded UTF8 ansistring
codebases, something I don't think that is healthy. If unicode is
postponed
to the next major release, it will be long, very long before this is
cleaned
Waiting with
On 03 May 2009, at 13:54, Marco van de Voort wrote:
(I thought btw, generics in 2.2.4 had improved to being more or less
usable?)
A number of important bugs were indeed fixed. But as far as I know,
several more are left.
Jonas
___
fpc-devel
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 23:55, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be wrote:
On 03 May 2009, at 13:54, Marco van de Voort wrote:
(I thought btw, generics in 2.2.4 had improved to being more or less
usable?)
A number of important bugs were indeed fixed. But as far as I know, several
more are
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
On 03 May 2009, at 13:54, Marco van de Voort wrote:
(I thought btw, generics in 2.2.4 had improved to being more or less
usable?)
A number of important bugs were indeed fixed. But as far as I know,
several more are left.
I see no problem if a certain feature has
On 03 May 2009, at 14:58, Alexander Klenin wrote:
BTW, is generics good enough to be used in e.g. math.pp?
Afaik, generics have only been implemented for classes until now.
Plain generic functions are not (yet) supported.
Jonas
___
fpc-devel
While fixing http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13619,
Jonas did not apply neither code cleanup not comment fix parts of it.
Are such changes not wanted?
I did not made a separate patch for them -- should I?
I thought they are trivial and obvious.
On a more generic note -- will massive code
13 matches
Mail list logo
