[fpc-devel] Re: Accepted fpc 2.6.2-1 (source amd64 all)

2013-05-31 Thread Abou Al Montacir
Hi Peter, I was about committing new changes to fix build issue and saw that you already have fix that. If you don't mind I'd like to change your patch slightly as follow (cf attached patch) Please note that fpmake is a build tool which is compiled and ran on host while building the compiler

Re: [fpc-devel] Re: Accepted fpc 2.6.2-1 (source amd64 all)

2013-05-30 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, peter green said: I've sorted the armhf specific issue. As expected it just required some tweaking of ifdefs so that the code in question wasn't used when building the rtl with 2.6.0. After sorting that issue it failed with much the same linker problem with fpmake

Re: [fpc-devel] Re: Accepted fpc 2.6.2-1 (source amd64 all)

2013-05-30 Thread peter green
Marco van de Voort wrote: After some discussion, something to try: try adding -dNO_THREADING to CROSSOPT (for target) and maybe also to OPT (for host) Unfortunately it seems that at least when building natively (note: debian is and always has been natively built) neither OPT or CROSSOPT is

[fpc-devel] Re: Accepted fpc 2.6.2-1 (source amd64 all)

2013-05-29 Thread peter green
For those reading this on fpc-devel the context is that the upload of fpc 2.6.2 to debian failed on most architectures and I would like upstream input on sorting it out. Abou Al Montacir wrote: Many targets are broken: powerpc, sparc, armel, armhf. The error message looks very similar on 3