Re: [fpc-devel] Re: Bug in revision 9781/2

2008-01-19 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Sat, 19 Jan 2008, schreef Karl-Michael Schindler: Hallo, it's me again. Bug is fixed with revision 9785 Well, not fixed, but just disabled on Darwin. However, it did finally succeed on Win32 this night. Hi there, when cycling fpc on macosx/darwin-386 (10.5) I get this error:

Re: [fpc-devel] Re: Bug in revision 9781/2

2008-01-19 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 19 Jan 2008, at 15:54, Peter Vreman wrote: This call and pop is old-style PIC and not good for new cpus because it breaks the call-stack. Please use the new style that calls a function (fpc_geteipasebx). This also generated by the compiler. See i386/cgcpu.pas and search for

Re: [fpc-devel] Re: Bug in revision 9781/2

2008-01-19 Thread Marc Weustink
Daniël Mantione wrote: Op Sat, 19 Jan 2008, schreef Jonas Maebe: On 19 Jan 2008, at 15:54, Peter Vreman wrote: This call and pop is old-style PIC and not good for new cpus because it breaks the call-stack. Please use the new style that calls a function (fpc_geteipasebx). This also

Re: [fpc-devel] Re: Bug in revision 9781/2

2008-01-19 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Sat, 19 Jan 2008, schreef Marc Weustink: Daniël Mantione wrote: Op Sat, 19 Jan 2008, schreef Jonas Maebe: On 19 Jan 2008, at 15:54, Peter Vreman wrote: This call and pop is old-style PIC and not good for new cpus because it breaks the call-stack. Please use the new style that calls

[fpc-devel] Re: Bug in revision 9781/2

2008-01-18 Thread Karl-Michael Schindler
Hallo, it's me again. Bug is fixed with revision 9785 Hi there, when cycling fpc on macosx/darwin-386 (10.5) I get this error: i386.inc(1198,1) Error: Unknown label identifier .LPIC with revision 9781/2. I tried 2.3.1 and 2.2.1 call .LPic is actually one line before the declaration of