I have uploaded a patch[1] to remove the TSaxInputSource, it is
redundant with TXmlInputSource from XmlReader unit.
I believe the TSAXXMLReader.Parse method have almost the same
functionality of xmltextreader.TXMLTextReader.
I would like to know if and how it can be modified. The base class,
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014, Daniel Gaspary wrote:
I have uploaded a patch[1] to remove the TSaxInputSource, it is
redundant with TXmlInputSource from XmlReader unit.
I believe the TSAXXMLReader.Parse method have almost the same
functionality of xmltextreader.TXMLTextReader.
I would like to know if
12.03.2014 1:32, Daniel Gaspary пишет:
I have uploaded a patch[1] to remove the TSaxInputSource, it is
redundant with TXmlInputSource from XmlReader unit.
I believe the TSAXXMLReader.Parse method have almost the same
functionality of xmltextreader.TXMLTextReader.
I would like to know if and
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Sergei Gorelkin
sergei_gorel...@mail.ru wrote:
OTOH, if we go for breaking user's code, then it is much better to drop SAX
altogether and switch over to TXMLTextReader.
From these points of view the best way is probably to document
TXMLTextReader, deprecate SAX
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Daniel Gaspary dgasp...@gmail.com wrote:
On other topic, a new StaX[1] class, using TXMLTextReader,
I mean, *classes*.
Creating the writer part too.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
12.03.2014 18:10, Daniel Gaspary пишет:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Daniel Gaspary dgasp...@gmail.com wrote:
On other topic, a new StaX[1] class, using TXMLTextReader,
I mean, *classes*.
Creating the writer part too.
Why would you want to use S[t]AX approach in the first place? The
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Sergei Gorelkin
sergei_gorel...@mail.ru wrote:
Why would you want to use S[t]AX approach in the first place?
No special reason at the moment. I didn't examine TXmlTextReader so much yet.
The interface of .net-based XML[Text]Reader and XMLWriter is IMHO
much
12.03.2014 18:58, Daniel Gaspary пишет:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Sergei Gorelkin
sergei_gorel...@mail.ru wrote:
Why would you want to use S[t]AX approach in the first place?
No special reason at the moment. I didn't examine TXmlTextReader so much yet.
The interface of .net-based
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Sergei Gorelkin
sergei_gorel...@mail.ru wrote:
Here I fully agree, and in the meantime I've already committed some initial
changes to TXMLWriter to make it function like .net XMLTextWriter.
Are these changes at trunk? Fcl or LazUtils?
About DOM independence...
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Daniel Gaspary wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Sergei Gorelkin
sergei_gorel...@mail.ru wrote:
Here I fully agree, and in the meantime I've already committed some initial
changes to TXMLWriter to make it function like .net XMLTextWriter.
Are these changes at
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
Curious: How can XPath become dom independent ?
I thought the result of XPath was a series of DOM nodes ?
Yes, it is. But I'm thinking about using the XPath expressions in other classes.
Maybe a TXmlTextReader
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Daniel Gaspary wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
Curious: How can XPath become dom independent ?
I thought the result of XPath was a series of DOM nodes ?
Yes, it is. But I'm thinking about using the XPath
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
What can be achieved at the most seems to be the parsing of the expression
and the resulting parse tree.
Is exactly what I'm trying to say(my lack of English grammar skills
doesn't help). :)
I seriously doubt
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Sergei Gorelkin
sergei_gorel...@mail.ru wrote:
A certain subset of expressions (forward iteration only) can be handled that
way, yes.
But in general, XPath requires a source with non-sequential access.
Beyond this use case, could be useful to other
12.03.2014 21:46, Daniel Gaspary пишет:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
What can be achieved at the most seems to be the parsing of the expression
and the resulting parse tree.
Is exactly what I'm trying to say(my lack of English grammar
15 matches
Mail list logo
