Re: [fpc-devel] for .. in documentation and classes based iterators.
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019, Marco van de Voort wrote: Op 2019-09-03 om 12:59 schreef Michael Van Canneyt: "5. Any type for which an enumerator operator is defined. The enumerator operator must return a structured type that implements the IEnumerator interface. The type of the control variable’s type must equal the type of the enumerator’s GetCurrent return value type." but maybe that could be said more explicitly? What should be said more explicitly ? What does the delphi duck typing method getenumerator():TIterator; do with the iterator if it is of a classtype (not interface)? Where does it fit in the 5 cases outlined in the documentation article? Probably 5, but that only talks about the enumerator operator. I will improve that before 3.2 is out. Michael.___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] for .. in documentation and classes based iterators.
Op 2019-09-03 om 12:59 schreef Michael Van Canneyt: "5. Any type for which an enumerator operator is defined. The enumerator operator must return a structured type that implements the IEnumerator interface. The type of the control variable’s type must equal the type of the enumerator’s GetCurrent return value type." but maybe that could be said more explicitly? What should be said more explicitly ? What does the delphi duck typing method getenumerator():TIterator; do with the iterator if it is of a classtype (not interface)? Where does it fit in the 5 cases outlined in the documentation article? Probably 5, but that only talks about the enumerator operator. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] for .. in documentation and classes based iterators.
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019, Marco van de Voort wrote: I did an initial patch to add for..in iterator support in fcl-stl ghashmap (https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=35940) I've looked at the docs of for..in, and it doesn't seem to name the delphi getenumerator() method in its options. I assume it is equal to point 5, the enumerator operator, because a for..in this way doesn't cause a memory leak. "5. Any type for which an enumerator operator is defined. The enumerator operator must return a structured type that implements the IEnumerator interface. The type of the control variable’s type must equal the type of the enumerator’s GetCurrent return value type." but maybe that could be said more explicitly? What should be said more explicitly ? Michael.___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
[fpc-devel] for .. in documentation and classes based iterators.
I did an initial patch to add for..in iterator support in fcl-stl ghashmap (https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=35940) I've looked at the docs of for..in, and it doesn't seem to name the delphi getenumerator() method in its options. I assume it is equal to point 5, the enumerator operator, because a for..in this way doesn't cause a memory leak. "5. Any type for which an enumerator operator is defined. The enumerator operator must return a structured type that implements the IEnumerator interface. The type of the control variable’s type must equal the type of the enumerator’s GetCurrent return value type." but maybe that could be said more explicitly? ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
