On 7 okt 2005, at 10:26, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
There is no reason against this, except that I'm not sure
fpNanoSleep()
exists on all platforms. Select() does.
It should exist on most *nixes:
The nanosleep() function conforms to IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993 (``POSIX.
1'').
Jonas
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Ales Katona wrote:
Hello, I'd like to ask why Sleep() function in unix world uses Select()
instead of fpNanoSleep()? Is there a particular reason? After a somewhat
riggid discussion on the channel yesterday I came up testing threading using
sleep() and nanosleep(). The di
Hello, I'd like to ask why Sleep() function in unix world uses Select()
instead of fpNanoSleep()? Is there a particular reason? After a somewhat
riggid discussion on the channel yesterday I came up testing threading
using sleep() and nanosleep(). The difference in speed is huge. I'm
prepared to
