Daniël Mantione schrieb:
Op Thu, 11 Jan 2007, schreef Jesus Reyes:
If you don't see a problem to do, why not simply do it?
They are merged.
But, if nobody uses it, why it's being updated?, this simply doesn't
match.
No active development is done, but at request we still do some
Hi.
I'm finally tired of two bugs in fcl in 2.0.5, it could be possible
that these be made/merged back?.
1. TSQLQuery under 2.0.5 stores readonly published property IndexDefs
into lazarus lfm file. Lazarus is happy reading back the lfm file if
it was compiled with 2.0.5 but if it was compiled
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jesus Reyes wrote:
Hi.
I'm finally tired of two bugs in fcl in 2.0.5, it could be possible
that these be made/merged back?.
1. TSQLQuery under 2.0.5 stores readonly published property IndexDefs
into lazarus lfm file. Lazarus is happy reading back the lfm file if
I don't see the use. We're preparing to release 2.2.
In March we do a code freeze and start the release process.
Michael.
I think the use is something like january, february, march and possibly
april.
That's 4 months of bugs with no choice but 2.1.1
Rather ackward if you ask me.
Ales
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jesus Reyes wrote:
--- Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jesus Reyes wrote:
Hi.
I'm finally tired of two bugs in fcl in 2.0.5, it could be
possible
that these be made/merged back?.
1. TSQLQuery under
Op Thu, 11 Jan 2007, schreef Michael Van Canneyt:
Well,
As far as I know, there are no releases or snapshots built of 2.0.5,
so why would we update that branch ?
Oh come on, you should know this. Daily snapshots are being built for Dos,
Win32, i386 Linux and x86_64 Linux.
Consider the
--- Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jesus Reyes wrote:
--- Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jesus Reyes wrote:
Hi.
I'm finally tired of two bugs in fcl in 2.0.5, it could be
Op Thu, 11 Jan 2007, schreef Jesus Reyes:
If you don't see a problem to do, why not simply do it?
They are merged.
But, if nobody uses it, why it's being updated?, this simply doesn't
match.
No active development is done, but at request we still do some merges.
I use 2.1.1 and 2.0.5,
