i'm trying to figure out why i'm seeing the following failures...
c:\freepascal\fpc\trunk is SVN updated (25100 at this run)... yes, i see that i
can possibly remove clean from the second make line in the following...
everything before the [CHOMP] is my script... everything after the [CHOMP] i
Hi,
the IDE segfaults (SIGSEGV) on startup on my System.
I have the problem with fpc on amd64/linux/debian and didnt test on other
systems.
The strange thing is, that I know a way to start the ide which works, but I
dont find the problem.
I normally have only the Debian Package installed, but f
I have narrowed done a problem in terminfo to the external C
declaration via ncurses of the variable cur_term.
According to oliebol this should be for fpk or jonas.
This is an example program:
mischi2.pp
Description: application/text
At 16:47 5-2-2004, Karl-Michael Schindler wrote:
I tried the IDE and the problem was that it needs fvision, which didn't
compile since it contains 386 assembler. Correct me if I am wrong.
80's/90's interface wouldn't be to bad, since my smaller kids may use
Turbopascal at school.
I tried lazaru
On 5 feb 2004, at 14:10, Karl-Michael Schindler wrote:
What is actually the idea about further developments of the IDE, with
my particular interest in Darwin.
My impression is that the FPIDE is winx and linux, but not *bsd and
not much further development.
The problem is that the two people who
I tried the IDE and the problem was that it needs fvision, which didn't
compile since it contains 386 assembler. Correct me if I am wrong.
80's/90's interface wouldn't be to bad, since my smaller kids may use
Turbopascal at school.
I tried lazarus, but somehow I managed to screw up the whole fp
Karl-Michael Schindler wrote:
Hi there,
What is actually the idea about further developments of the IDE, with my
particular interest in Darwin.
My impression is that the FPIDE is winx and linux, but not *bsd and not
much further development.
Then there is lazarus with more drive, but not much *b
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:10:41 +0100 Karl-Michael Schindler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> What is actually the idea about further developments of the IDE, with
> my particular interest in Darwin.
> My impression is that the FPIDE is winx and linux, but not *bsd and not
> much furthe
> What is actually the idea about further developments of the IDE, with
> my particular interest in Darwin.
> My impression is that the FPIDE is winx and linux, but not *bsd and not
> much further development.
The textmode IDE is effectively frozen, since there is no maintainer.
> Then there is
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Karl-Michael Schindler wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> What is actually the idea about further developments of the IDE, with
> my particular interest in Darwin.
> My impression is that the FPIDE is winx and linux, but not *bsd and not
> much further development.
> Then there is lazaru
Hi there,
What is actually the idea about further developments of the IDE, with
my particular interest in Darwin.
My impression is that the FPIDE is winx and linux, but not *bsd and not
much further development.
Then there is lazarus with more drive, but not much *bsd stuff there
too and overal
>It is not finished yet but it includes some important requirements an IDE must have.
>
>If you want I can send you the IDE.
>
Constantin, if it is possible I would like to try your development too.
Alex Kalabukhov.
___
fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL P
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Jucovschi Constantin wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I received the mail about FreePascal IDE. I think I could help you but first I would
> like to have more details about what are the requirements and responsibilities of a
> maintainer. I have some experience in IDE making and I
Hello,
I received
the mail about FreePascal IDE. I think I could help you but first I would
like to have more details about what are the requirements and responsibilities
of a maintainer. I have some experience in IDE making and I would like to give
you more details about an IDE we (me and
> I am interesting in fp ide future plans. When do you plan to release its
> 1.0 version?
There is no maintainer anymore. The current core developpers have no time
to work on the ide. We need somebody outside the core team that wants to
maintain and extend the ide.
_
Rimgaudas Laucius wrote:
I am interesting in fp ide future plans. When do you plan to release its
1.0 version?
The problem is that there is currently no real maintainer for the IDE so
there is no progress in IDE development.
___
fpc-devel maillist -
I am interesting in fp ide future plans. When do
you plan to release its 1.0 version?
17 matches
Mail list logo
