Re: [fpc-devel]Re: Some idea of joint units

2003-11-15 Thread Yakov Sudeikin
How about this? uses {$i vcl.inc}; This would be the usage of preprocessor, which will work of course, but as the whole progressive humanity seeks the way to avoid preprocessors, it might be not wise to go like this. Yakov ___ fpc-devel maillist -

Re: [fpc-devel]promised tthread patch

2003-11-15 Thread Michael . VanCanneyt
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Johannes Berg wrote: On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 21:34, KJK::Hyperion wrote: I don't agree with the notes about Suspend/Resume. Suspending a thread on POSIX is possible, as long as you define what suspending means. Assuming a suspended thread is a thread that doesn't

Re: [fpc-devel]promised tthread patch

2003-11-15 Thread KJK::Hyperion
At 12.27 15/11/2003, you wrote: All you need to do is send the STOP signal to the thread. This is a common misunderstanding. I quote from IEEE 1003.1: [...] Note that pthread_kill() only causes the signal to be handled in the context of the given thread; the signal action (termination or

Re: [fpc-devel]promised tthread patch

2003-11-15 Thread Michael . VanCanneyt
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, KJK::Hyperion wrote: At 12.27 15/11/2003, you wrote: All you need to do is send the STOP signal to the thread. This is a common misunderstanding. I quote from IEEE 1003.1: [...] Note that pthread_kill() only causes the signal to be handled in the context of the

Re: [fpc-devel]promised tthread patch

2003-11-15 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, KJK::Hyperion wrote: At 12.27 15/11/2003, you wrote: All you need to do is send the STOP signal to the thread. This is a common misunderstanding. I quote from IEEE 1003.1: [...] Note that pthread_kill() only causes the signal to be