3: the PASCAL way
boolean is a totally seperate type from integer types so the compiler
knows whether you mean logial or bitwise operations. I don't know if false
That's the point. :-)
and true having ordinal values of 0 and 1 is part of a standard or a
borlandism but im pretty sure its
El Sábado, 1 de Enero de 2005 09:06, Jose Manuel escribiste:
So i think. I think Ord(TRUE), Succ(FALSE), etc. are valid Standard and
Extended Pascal expressions, as well as the behaviour of a declarion of
As far as I know:
Ord(True) Ord(False) = True
Succ(False) = True
...are not only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
E.g.: gzip.xyz, is this based on a gzip unit or a gzip variable or...
Does this matter to you ?
Normally one never uses a fully qualified identifier.
And that can become a problem, when a variable and a unit has the same
name. That's why I do not only prefer to
Nico Aragón wrote:
IIRC, any non-zero value is evaluated as True for a Boolean variable.
You should not guess about any implementation.
I don't. Do I?
Yes, you do. How can you know what bit pattern is stored in a boolean
variable? Using typecasts may result in silent type conversion,
[merged responses to two messages]
El Sábado, 1 de Enero de 2005 06:54, DrDiettrich escribiste:
¡Serás melón!
Could you please help me to improve my rudimentary Spanish? ;-)
http://hotel.jp-guide.net/job/point/melon.jpg
(Eierkopf? ;-)
My rudimentary... I meant my non-existent... whatever
Can't seem to get bug submission to work so I'm sending this here.
The 1.9.x distributed binaries of plex and pyacc both fail, as well as any
created from a 1.9.5 source snapshot. plex ends normally but only creates 2
states. pyacc fails with a RTE 216 on a move in procedure setunion of
