On Fri, 7 May 2021, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
In my opinion the better solution is to continue the road that Maciej
started and to implement that "default field" concept together with
operator hoistening so that records with management operators can be
used as containers. This is
Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-devel schrieb
am Fr., 7. Mai 2021, 08:14:
>
>
> On Fri, 7 May 2021, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
>
> >
> > In my opinion the better solution is to continue the road that Maciej
> > started and to implement that "default field" concept together with
> > operator
On Fri, 7 May 2021, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
I thought it was agreed at the time that this was the most viable way
forward ?
As far as I remember there wasn't really any agreement.
Can be, I was not sure... I remember this path was investigated.
IIRC there was also the proposal
> On May 7, 2021, at 3:08 AM, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-devel
> wrote:
>
> The introduction of generics and their abundant use in Delphi has noticably
> slowed down the compiler and increased binary sizes. To my dismay, compile
> times of 20 seconds up to 2 minutes have become not
> On May 6, 2021, at 11:40 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> In my opinion the better solution is to continue the road that Maciej started
> and to implement that "default field" concept together with operator
> hoistening so that records with management operators can be used as
> containers. This
> On May 7, 2021, at 9:40 AM, Benito van der Zander via fpc-devel
> wrote:
>
> the classic Delphi way was to use an interface for freeing. It only requires
> one type and nothing blows up.
>
That's clever but even try..finally is less overhead.
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
> On May 7, 2021, at 2:46 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel
> wrote:
>
> I cannot speak for others, but I think 90% of potential use cases for ref
> counting
> would be covered like this in my code: objects that only live inside a
> procedure.
>
> I think the same.
There's also a function
Hi,
Don't forget that the record/management operator approach will again
blow up binary size; for every variable declared like this you risk
creating a new type.
the classic Delphi way was to use an interface for freeing. It only
requires one type and nothing blows up.
type
TDefer =
Ryan Joseph via fpc-devel schrieb am Fr.,
7. Mai 2021, 05:58:
>
>
> > On May 6, 2021, at 7:14 PM, Ryan Joseph wrote:
> >
> > This can be detected at compile and at least give a warning. "a" is a
> member of TR and the element type of "a" is TR, then we're assigning TR to
> said array. It's that
> On May 7, 2021, at 2:52 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> As said the main problem of reference counting on object instances,
> especially if enabled by default like the Delphi NextGen compiler did, will
> lead to problems in *existing* code and thus is a no-go.
>
What did you think about me
> On May 6, 2021, at 11:40 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> There is no "finalization" section. It's really just an implicit try ...
> finally block that the compiler inserts. Look for "cs_implicit_exceptions"
> and "pi_needs_implicit_finally" if you want to learn more.
Does that mean if you
07.05.2021, 06:09, "Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-devel" :On Fri, 7 May 2021, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote: I thought it was agreed at the time that this was the most viable way forward ? As far as I remember there wasn't really any agreement.Can be, I was not sure... I remember this path was
12 matches
Mail list logo
