else
WriteLn('Other');
This better should read:
WriteLn('corrupt data space!!!'); Panic;
Much more useful :-
(AFAIK) you do.
You're programing, the C way.
You can't expect that -1 equals True, and any other value equals false, (I
really dunno, but I think I could
[]
You're programing, the C way.
[]
You can't expect that -1 equals True, and any other value
equals false, (I
You can expect whatever it's documented equals true and
sometimes you must
That's right. I can expect whatever is documented. In C there's no boolean
type. In Pascal (as in
3: the PASCAL way
boolean is a totally seperate type from integer types so the compiler
knows whether you mean logial or bitwise operations. I don't know if false
That's the point. :-)
and true having ordinal values of 0 and 1 is part of a standard or a
borlandism but im pretty sure its
I think it's slightly subtler. I guess that this code:
if not b then
WriteLn('False')
else if b then
WriteLn('True')
else
WriteLn('Other');
...could throw a different result.
IIRC, any non-zero value is evaluated as True for a Boolean
variable. The
No, and no.
Can somebody enlighten me, what code exactly fails in D6?
What extension does FPC have, that Delphi doesn't have?
And what iteration is desired? I'd use: For Low(x) To High(x)...
Let me add some more notes, regarding Delphi compatibility:
Older Delphi (and TP?) versions implemented
(note I did not use a T in front of StringList so as to distinguish it
from non-base types and also to maintain backwards compatibility with
existing code that uses TStringList conventionally)
jamie.
Are you always drunk?
___
fpc-devel
Well I will typically spend about 25% of my development time with
forward declarations, doing loads of try finaly blocks to free memory
and other things instead of implementing my application.
jamie.
Well, you are quite a machine. If you say so, sure it's so, but that's not
the problem.
Set8087CW() in system unit
SetExceptionMask() in unit math
It was for MacOsX we needed to get rid of libc,
I guess Set8087CW($133F) is not CPU independant (PowerPC,x86_64),
AFAIK, x86_32 will do too!!
so I will use
Math.SetExceptionMask([exDenormalized,exInvalidOp,exOverflow,e
Math.SetExceptionMask([exDenormalized,exInvalidOp,exOverflow,e
xPrecision,exUnderflow,exZeroDivide]);
[...]
stand for it). Anyway using Set8087CW (which is indeed CPU
dependant) does work under my equipment, SetExceptionMask doesn't.
SetExceptionMask calls Set8087CW on x86, so if
The error code is: 1930x00C1 N/A %1 is not a
valid Win32 application.
But that doesn´t make sense.
Can you try indicating another address space to be loaded in the 2nd lib?
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
The error code is: 193 0x00C1 N/A %1 is not a
valid Win32 application.
But that doesn?t make sense.
See if FPC has some directive for setting the DLL baseaddress
and set it,
and see if that matters.
I guess FPC is creating the DLL with no relocation section in it.
11 matches
Mail list logo
