epascal.org> On Behalf
> Of Ozz Nixon
> Sent: Saturday, 14 April 2018 23:16
> To: FPC developers' list <fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org>
> Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: Dangerous
> optimization in CASE..OF
>
> following the grammar, I would sugg
On 14.04.2018 15:16, Ozz Nixon wrote:
following the grammar, I would suggest “in” when trying to do what you want,
not “is”.
if a in 3..10 then begin
You can overload the IN operator:
https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refse104.html#x213-23500015.6
According to Jonas, this could
ists.freepascal.org> On Behalf
>> Of Ozz Nixon
>> Sent: Saturday, 14 April 2018 22:43
>> To: FPC developers' list <fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org>
>> Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: Dangerous
>> optimization in CASE..OF
>>
>&g
reepascal.org>
> Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: Dangerous
> optimization in CASE..OF
>
> I understand the thread, however, in one of the ISO standards for
> Pascal, the keyword is, is defined for type not value. The example
> I gave is the only wa
gt;
>> -Original Message-
>> From: fpc-devel <fpc-devel-boun...@lists.freepascal.org> On Behalf
>> Of Ozz Nixon
>> Sent: Saturday, 14 April 2018 22:13
>> To: FPC developers' list <fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org>
>> Subject: *** GMX Sp
org>
> Subject: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: [fpc-devel] Dangerous
> optimization in CASE..OF
>
> I have to ask why?
>
> i is Int64 only, will always be int64 only, so all other
> comparisons are always skipped.
>
> I could see this, inside a method with an untyp
