Once upon a time, on 11/28/2012 03:40 PM to be precise, luiz americo
pereira camara said:
So, i keep my points. Even because is not a big change with easy
implementation that will fix the above issues.
It IS a big change. There is production code out there that uses this,
and this is an
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, luiz americo pereira camara wrote:
2012/11/27 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, luiz americo pereira camara wrote:
Hi, i requested a change to observer interface with some
considerations in http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=23394
2012/11/28 michael.vancann...@wisa.be
It IS a big change. There is production code out there that uses this,
and this is an incompatible change.
Then Luiz is right on time with his proposal, with the frist release
candidate of the first release that contains this feature. If
production code
28.11.2012 16:23, Vincent Snijders wrote:
2012/11/28 michael.vancann...@wisa.be
It IS a big change. There is production code out there that uses this,
and this is an incompatible change.
Then Luiz is right on time with his proposal, with the frist release
candidate of the first release that
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, Vincent Snijders wrote:
2012/11/28 michael.vancann...@wisa.be
It IS a big change. There is production code out there that uses this,
and this is an incompatible change.
Then Luiz is right on time with his proposal, with the frist release
candidate of the first release
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
Then Luiz is right on time with his proposal, with the frist release
candidate of the first release that contains this feature. If
production code already uses it, then the production code writers must
have taken a risk for change
On 2012-11-28 08:23, Vincent Snijders wrote:
production code already uses it, then the production code writers must
have taken a risk for change knowing that this was a not yet released
feature.
+1
I thought it was a known fact that if you use FPC Trunk in production
code, you stand a very
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
Then Luiz is right on time with his proposal, with the frist release
candidate of the first release that contains this feature. If
production code already uses it, then the production
On 2012-11-28 09:41, Marco van de Voort wrote:
You often can't reroot external components, but if they support tcomponent
(and thus Tinterfacedobject), you can add an interface in a child class.
You can add a CORBA interface to any existing class, and it doesn't need
to descend from
On 2012-11-28 10:07, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
You can add a CORBA interface to any existing class, and it doesn't need
to descend from TInterfacedObject either. CORBA is not COM interfaces.
In case anybody is in doubt. Here is a small example where CORBA
interfaces are attached to
On 28 Nov 2012, at 09:23, Vincent Snijders wrote:
2012/11/28 michael.vancann...@wisa.be
It IS a big change. There is production code out there that uses
this,
and this is an incompatible change.
Then Luiz is right on time with his proposal, with the frist release
candidate of the first
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
At some point, there must be an object, and at some point, there is a
typecast,
You often can't reroot external components, but if they support tcomponent
What does reroot external components mean ?
(Change the root of their
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Vincent Snijders
vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/11/28 michael.vancann...@wisa.be
It IS a big change. There is production code out there that uses this,
and this is an incompatible change.
Then Luiz is right on time with his proposal, with the frist
On 2012-11-27 16:19, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The consequence is that you must pass around the objects themselves.
I'm curious to see Luiz's code example of what issues he has, but in the
mean time, maybe it wouldn't be such a bad idea to update (with latest
FPC changes and Observer
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
At some point, there must be an object, and at some point, there is a
typecast,
You often can't reroot external components, but if they support tcomponent
What does reroot external
2012/11/28 michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, luiz americo pereira camara wrote:
2012/11/27 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
As practical example take a LCL Form that is supposed to be observed.
It takes an Observer property and attach it to certain child controls
2012/11/28 Graeme Geldenhuys gra...@geldenhuys.co.uk:
Luiz, could you produce a small sample application (or show the code you
are working on for Lazarus) where you think the current FPC Observer
implementation doesn't work. Your initial bug report doesn't include any
test project to show
2012/11/28 Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be:
Personally, I think a release candidate is too late. A release candidate
freezes all interfaces (even a beta release does so already, normally).
Generally the only fixes still performed afterwards are for blocking
crashers/failures, major
On 28 Nov 2012, at 16:02, luiz americo pereira camara wrote:
2012/11/28 Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be:
Personally, I think a release candidate is too late. A release
candidate
freezes all interfaces (even a beta release does so already,
normally).
Generally the only fixes still
On 2012-11-28 15:02, luiz americo pereira camara wrote:
Given that better discuss / test / change such important change
earlier than later, nothing stops to treat this release as a beta (or
whatever name is appropriate) even if was formally released as a RC.
[Not related to the issue in
2012/11/28 Graeme Geldenhuys gra...@geldenhuys.co.uk:
On 2012-11-27 16:19, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
If you haven't made other changes to those LCL Mediators since the code
you emailed me, I could take a look at updating the code for Lazarus too.
That's a perfect example of the FPC
On 2012-11-27 16:19, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Correct. But the design should also not try to cover all possible use cases
at any cost.
Till now, I have not seen a common use case that will not work.
See Test1 in a separate message i sent. It will not work with the
current implementation
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, luiz americo pereira camara wrote:
2012/11/13 Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl:
Hello,
We have placed the first release-candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 2.6.2 on our ftp-servers.
[..]
* Support for observer pattern added to fcl-base (and base
- Original Message -
From: Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
To: FPC developers' list fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Considerations about observer [was: Free Pascal
2.6.2 rc1]
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012
On 2012-11-27 17:17, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Hi, does anyone know of a link to the wiki with info about the newly
implemented Observer pattern?.
No wiki page, but I did submit in the mailing list and Mantis a observer
demo with code comments to show how it works and how to use it.
- Original Message -
From: Graeme Geldenhuys gra...@geldenhuys.co.uk
To: fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Considerations about observer [was: Free Pascal
2.6.2 rc1]
On 2012-11-27 17:17, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote
26 matches
Mail list logo
