Op 2019-10-22 om 01:19 schreef J. Gareth Moreton:
For backward compatibility, I would suggest keeping the 'static'
directive for class methods so existing code doesn't break, but maybe
mark it as deprecated.
We need less dialectal variety, not more. The ambiguity of having two
forms in co
J. Gareth Moreton schrieb am Di., 22. Okt.
2019, 07:21:
> Fair enough. Thanks Sven. It just seemed to be a bit of an anomaly in my
> eyes. (The ambiguity shouldn't be an issue because of the semicolon
> following directives)
>
The parser will only know whether it's a directive or part of the
Fair enough. Thanks Sven. It just seemed to be a bit of an anomaly in
my eyes. (The ambiguity shouldn't be an issue because of the semicolon
following directives)
Just something I thought I'd bring up.
Gareth aka. Kit
On 22/10/2019 06:17, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
Am 22.10.2019 um
Am 22.10.2019 um 01:19 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton:
This is a very low-level semantic issue, but I'm not particularly keen
on how static methods are defined in classes.
Not being "keen" on an existing, established syntax is not reason enough
to change it.
Please also note (to probably annoy y
