Re: [fpc-other] Firebird vs PostgreSQL

2017-10-28 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
On 28/10/17 15:00, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: On 2017-10-28 13:34, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:> One of the (numerous) things I'm wrestling with at the moment is> PostgreSQL replication... Speaking of PostgreSQL, I just realised that tiOPF’s 3-hourly unit test runs don’t include tests against

Re: [fpc-other] Firebird vs PostgreSQL

2017-10-28 Thread geneb
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: rubbish any of them. Now I'm sorry if I've startled one of your holy cows, but right now I've got my own problems and I don't see spending *rofl* I'm going to file that right next to "sacred cow tipping". :D g. -- Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007

Re: [fpc-other] Firebird vs PostgreSQL

2017-10-28 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 2017-10-28 13:34, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: One of the (numerous) things I'm wrestling with at the moment is PostgreSQL replication... Speaking of PostgreSQL, I just realised that tiOPF’s 3-hourly unit test runs don’t include tests against PostgreSQL. I’m busy setting that up now. This

Re: [fpc-other] Firebird vs PostgreSQL

2017-10-28 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 2017-10-28 11:26, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: I've suggested that different servers have different areas of applicability, I better mention that I replied before I saw your list of reasons for using PostgreSQL. Apologies if I upset you. Chill please - no "holly war" was intended. Regards,