On 2017-10-27 10:17, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I think that a
reasonable approach is to select Postgres for departmental or larger
storage, or Firebird for something that's strictly local.
Once again... why must Firebird always be reduced to the “only for
smaller database needs” environments?
On 2017-10-27 11:04, Santiago A. wrote:
Why Postgres is better for "departmental or larger storage"? What has
Postgres that Firebird hasn't?
Exactly. In my years of using Firebird, I think it is a perfect fit for
small and large environments.
Regards,
Graeme
On 27/10/17 10:15, Santiago A. wrote:
So, again, what has Postgres that Firebird hasn't? I have worked with
firebird a lot, but not with Postgres, it will be interesting a review
of someone who has worked with both.
Aggressively-tested compliance with SQL "correctness", including
regression
On 26/10/17 11:00, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Santiago A. said:> That's my point. Why Firebird is not more popular?> > Once I
read two point about Firebird lack of popularity:> * In early days, firebird documentation was almost inexistent,
there> were a few .txt with
