On 16/03/2015 14:18, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hello Martin,
On 2015-03-16 13:17, Martin Frb wrote:
Local commits (commit, without push) can be a huge advantage.
Ah yes, but they loved the idea shortly afterwards.
As I said they *can* be a huge advantage.
svn up is roughly equal to:
On 16.3.2015 г. 14:24, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I can also add that SubVersion has *no* concept of Tags. To SubVersion
there is no difference between a Tag and a Branch. Why do I say that?
Simply because you can create a Tag in the repository, and then start
adding commits to it just mind
Hello Martin,
On 2015-03-16 13:17, Martin Frb wrote:
Local commits (commit, without push) can be a huge advantage.
Ah yes, but they loved the idea shortly afterwards. Then weeks later
when I mentioned the rebase command to neaten up local commits before
you make it public - that was another
On 03/16/2015 11:34 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
But again, use whatever fits you best. I did deep evaluations of many
systems, then made my choice. So far, I'm very happy with my choice and
outcome.
Yes, we *know*. You have made us well aware of this fact. :)
Nikolay
Hello Martin,
On 2015-03-16 12:35, Martin Frb wrote:
better product, simply means: Compared to others it scores better on
more use cases.
Agreed. :-)
Different people learn in different ways. There will be a fair share of
people for whom taking their first steps into using a repository
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
If you want facts, then do a Google search. See the exponential growth
of projects migrating from SubVersion (or other systems) to Git. Qt,
KDE, Linux Kernel etc - they are massive projects and must have had very
good reason to move to Git.
The Linux developers moved
On 16 March 2015 at 11:50, Mark Morgan Lloyd
markmll.fpc-ot...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
If you want facts, then do a Google search. See the exponential growth
of projects migrating from SubVersion (or other systems) to Git. Qt,
KDE, Linux Kernel etc - they are
Hello Frank,
On 2015-03-16 12:08, vfclists . wrote:
have there been any good surveys supporting that conclusion?
Yes, mine. :-P
G.
___
fpc-other maillist - fpc-other@lists.freepascal.org
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
A better metric might be finding somebody who offers a selection of VCS
protocols (possibly with a common backend- I believe such things exist?)
and then looking at the relative use for checkouts etc.
You can start by looking at the
Hello Mark,
On 2015-03-16 11:50, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
details perhaps they'd explain them, after all /somebody/ has to give
Graeme something concrete on which to build his argument :-)
hehehe... Just watch Linus's Google Tech Talk on YouTube. ;-)
I can also add that SubVersion has *no*
On 16/03/2015 09:23, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
As the majority of developers would tell you, Git is simply the better
product at this stage.
That I can live with.
There is a 2nd potential point of confusion to it.
better product, simply means: Compared to others it scores better on
more use
Hello Martin,
On 2015-03-16 14:35, Martin Frb wrote:
A simple git alias can do that for you all in one command. ;-)
And in a GUI? The only GUI on windows that was to my taste, is Tortoise.
And exactly why I don't bother with 3rd party GUI frontends. They *all*
lack git features.
I found
Hello Florian,
On 2015-03-16 19:51, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
But why do you use Pascal then?
Sadly, I'm slowly moving to Java. Go where the work is.
Regards,
Graeme
___
fpc-other maillist - fpc-other@lists.freepascal.org
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hello Mark,
On 2015-03-16 11:50, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
details perhaps they'd explain them, after all /somebody/ has to give
Graeme something concrete on which to build his argument :-)
hehehe... Just watch Linus's Google Tech Talk on YouTube. ;-)
I can also add
Am 16.03.2015 um 13:53 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
Hello Martin,
On 2015-03-16 12:35, Martin Frb wrote:
better product, simply means: Compared to others it scores better on
more use cases.
Agreed. :-)
Different people learn in different ways. There will be a fair share of
people
Am 16.03.2015 um 10:23 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
As the majority of developers would tell you, Git is simply the better
product at this stage.
If you want facts, then do a Google search. See the exponential growth
of projects migrating from SubVersion (or other systems) to Git. Qt,
KDE,
Hello Martin,
On 2015-03-15 20:32, Martin Frb wrote:
But that does not change, that there are developers who store their
projects in GIT, but who do not use the features at all. For such a
developer it can be said, that even CVS has more feature, than the set
of features they use in GIT.
Hello Martin,
On 2015-03-15 20:49, Martin Frb wrote:
I did judge your statement on it, that
/As 99% of developers would tell you, Git is simply// the better product./
My apologies if there has been some confusion. Probably down to a
language barrier issue.
In the context the usage of 99%
18 matches
Mail list logo
