Dr Dobbs august edition has a small note about FPC 2.0.0 release :-)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
L505 wrote:
Neato.. offtopic but if anyone wondered, the delphi compiler is
originated from borland C++ as far as my tools told me.
Yes, actually DCC32 is written in C++. Only the Delphi IDE is written in
Delphi. FPC and Lazarus are both written in FPC :)
__
> No, FPC is entirely written in Pascal (just like gcc is written in C
> and not in assembler). The original bootstrap was with Turbo Pascal,
> but TP compatibility has been dropped a long time ago. It must be
> bootstrapped with itself now.
Neato.. offtopic but if anyone wondered, the delphi com
> By the way, how would one compile Pascal code without a Pascal
compiler? No
> magic script file will avoid the need for fpc.
I asked this question on C2 wiki once..
I guess you could start by hardcoding a binary program from scratch in a
text editor with your bare hands. Then you have the meani
> Okey,
> but I think that the first stage for make fpc is to compiling some asm
> or c files using binutils, right?
Incorrect.
> so in cygwin I have binutils, even gcc, how I shoud to do to create
> first fpc from ASMs or Cs files?
You can't, FPC is written in pascal.
___
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Jose Pascual wrote:
> > Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc?
> > Is there some makefile or script in fpc (cvs) to avoid to use a fpc
> > 1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to create a fpc new version?
>
> IIRC, fpc 1.0.0 can be made with tur
On 16 aug 2005, at 21:44, Jose Pascual wrote:
Okey,
but I think that the first stage for make fpc is to compiling some asm
or c files using binutils, right?
No, FPC is entirely written in Pascal (just like gcc is written in C
and not in assembler). The original bootstrap was with Turbo Pasc
Okey,
but I think that the first stage for make fpc is to compiling some asm
or c files using binutils, right?
so in cygwin I have binutils, even gcc, how I shoud to do to create
first fpc from ASMs or Cs files?
>
> On 16 aug 2005, at 20:24, Jose Pascual wrote:
>
> > Is there some posibility t
> Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc?
> Is there some makefile or script in fpc (cvs) to avoid to use a fpc
> 1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to create a fpc new version?
Cygwin runs exclusively on Windows machines... FPC has a Windows port.
Whilst I can see the point of a port to Cygwin,
On 16 aug 2005, at 20:24, Jose Pascual wrote:
Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc?
No.
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Jose Pascual wrote:
Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc?
Is there some makefile or script in fpc (cvs) to avoid to use a fpc
1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to create a fpc new version?
IIRC, fpc 1.0.0 can be made with turbo pascal 7.
Vincent.
__
Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc?
Is there some makefile or script in fpc (cvs) to avoid to use a fpc
1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to create a fpc new version?
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Is there some 2.0 fpc release for cygwin?
> > If no, How can I build it starting from the scratch?
>
>
> The Problem:
>
> The problem is that I can't seem to figure out how to get FPC to link to
> static libraries. FPC's linker won't look for the "Wrapper.lib". It
> either wants "Wrapper.dll" or "Wrapper.lib.dll". I can compile wrapper.c
> to an object module (in Visual C 6.0) and FPC will
Background:
I have an old DOS console program that I'm trying to resurrect to run on
Windows XP. There isn't much about the structure of the program that I
need (or want) to change. But the interfaces to hardware will have to
change. It uses the old "PORT" array to communicate to the Serial
On 15 aug 2005, at 15:06, Carsten Bager wrote:
I have been experimenting with compiling to an embedded
ARM platform I succeeded in compiling with a minimum
system unit.
Now the ARM processor can blink with a LED.
I then tried to put in a Writeln just to se what library modules
there was missing
> Hi there,
>
> Is there some 2.0 fpc release for cygwin?
> If no, How can I build it starting from the scratch?
There is no release. If you want to start a cygwin special the best way is
to start with a unix target and adapt it for cygwin. Things like opening
files etc. all need to be done throug
Hi there,
Is there some 2.0 fpc release for cygwin?
If no, How can I build it starting from the scratch?
tia!
best regards
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
17 matches
Mail list logo