Re: [fpc-pascal] x86_64-win64

2006-04-21 Thread Bisma Jayadi
People following the svn changes recently might have noticed that a lot of changes regarding win64 happened. So we're proud to announce the first x86_64-win64 snapshot which is also probably the first available OSS compiler for win64. Is there any publication page about this, on the wiki or fpc

Re: [fpc-pascal] x86_64-win64

2006-04-21 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, constantijnw wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Writing_portable_code_regarding_the_processor_architecture#32_Bit_vs._64_Bit And of course the documentation: http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/prog.html more

Re: [fpc-pascal] x86_64-win64

2006-04-21 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Bisma Jayadi wrote: People following the svn changes recently might have noticed that a lot of changes regarding win64 happened. So we're proud to announce the first x86_64-win64 snapshot which is also probably the first available OSS compiler for win64. Is there any publication page

[fpc-pascal] fpc + linux, problem with VarArrayCreate, variant

2006-04-21 Thread Ryszard Kadow
helllo! Variable V is variant type, in first step V must be array type (V := VarArrayCreate)in second step type varBYte. In delphi and lazarus everything is ok. in fpc 2.0.2 (linux) program show error EVariantInvalidOpError. See example below. where is error? =

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC on NetBSD (i386)

2006-04-21 Thread Adrian Maier
On 4/19/06, Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It depends. If you get 2.0 running, there's probably not that much you have to change to your patches to get 2.0.2 and 2.1.1 running as wel. The downside is that you have to download the 2.0 sources. The upside is that you don't have to mess

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC on NetBSD (i386)

2006-04-21 Thread Adrian Maier
( i'm re-posting. My answer got rejected bacause gmail's smtp is blacklisted as spam *again* . very annoying ) On 4/19/06, Jonas Maebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It depends. If you get 2.0 running, there's probably not that much you have to change to your patches to get 2.0.2 and 2.1.1