[fpc-pascal] OLE Automation

2009-04-16 Thread Thomas Nelson
Hello, I would like to use FPC with OLE Automation in the windows environment. I have tried to do some research and it appears that the 2.3.1 version is referenced frequently. I have updated my compiler to 2.3.1 (2009/04/15) in hopes of finding some OLE examples. I have searched the wiki to

[fpc-pascal] Allegro.pas 4.3.0 Alpha released

2009-04-16 Thread Guillermo Martínez Jiménez
This is an old note. I forgot to post it. Few days ago I released the second Alpha of Allegro.pas 4.3.0 Allegro.pas is a wrapper to allow Pascal programmers to use the Allegro game library (http://alleg.sourceforge.net/). This new version introduces support for GNU/Linux (at cost drop drop the

[fpc-pascal] Re: How to use fpcmake

2009-04-16 Thread Guillermo Martínez Jiménez
From: Graeme Geldenhuys Hi Guillermo, I struggled with it as well. Henry Vermaak then created an example for me and showed how to use it. The example he did was for the fpGUI Toolkit project. Usage: - Compile fpmake.pas as follows: fpc fpmake.pas - To find out

Re: [fpc-pascal] How I can install FPC IDE in MacOS

2009-04-16 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:17:33 -0500 Travis Siegel tsie...@softcon.com wrote: On Apr 11, 2009, at 5:13 AM, Adam Pahlevi wrote: i don't understand how to do that, i search all my need in Internet, but they all refer to Lazarus. Is there FPC IDE that can run inside Mac OS X I for one

Re: [fpc-pascal] Difference between initialization and begin in a unit

2009-04-16 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 20:11:42 -0700 (PDT) leledumbo leledumbo_c...@yahoo.co.id wrote: Might be a stupid question, but it's nowhere mentioned in the documentation though allowed. What are the differences between: unit A; interface implementation initialization initialization code

RE: [fpc-pascal] Difference between initialization and begin in a unit

2009-04-16 Thread Cox, Stuart TRAN:EX
Could there be one slight difference in that an initialization section is required if there's going to be a finalization section in the unit? That is, there can't be a finalization section in the absence of an initialization section? Stu Cox Project Management Technician Southern Interior Region

[fpc-pascal] program interpreter for arm eabi is wrong

2009-04-16 Thread Terry Kemp
I can't seem to find the secret sauce that gives me program interpreter = ld-linux.so.3 for my arm eabi prgrams so I am having to symlink /lib/ld-linux.so.2 to /lib/ld-linux.so.3 on my gumstix. It used to work for me with the FPC_ARMEL ifdef in tlinux.pas {$ifdef arm} {$ifdef FPC_ARMEL}

Re: [fpc-pascal] Difference between initialization and begin in a unit

2009-04-16 Thread Benedikt Schindler
Unit B should just work if it is named Programm B In a Unit there didn't just exist a begin. (as far as i know my programms :) ) The initialization section is called when the unit is linked the first time into the programm by a uses class. so it is called before everithing else is going on,

Re: [fpc-pascal] Difference between initialization and begin in a unit

2009-04-16 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:44:13 -0700 Cox, Stuart TRAN:EX stuart@gov.bc.ca wrote: Could there be one slight difference in that an initialization section is required if there's going to be a finalization section in the unit? That is, there can't be a finalization section in the absence of an

Re: [fpc-pascal] OLE Automation

2009-04-16 Thread leledumbo
What about some http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Office_Automation Office Automation ? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/OLE-Automation-tp23076875p23090062.html Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.