Am 28.12.2010 04:17, schrieb Jeppe Johansen:
They are C APIs indeed. I just took a stab at it, and after a long day
of pointer errors in converted C code and really, really badly
descriptions of error messages, I managed to port the example from here
On low-spec systems (for example Linux on ARM with 32Mb or Solaris on
SPARC with 128Mb) linking a large project such as the Lazarus IDE can
take several days.
Is it possible to get any sort of activity indication that confirms that
the linker is actually doing something useful, rather than
Den 28-12-2010 10:03, Florian Klämpfl skrev:
Am 28.12.2010 04:17, schrieb Jeppe Johansen:
They are C APIs indeed. I just took a stab at it, and after a long day
of pointer errors in converted C code and really, really badly
descriptions of error messages, I managed to port the example from here
Hi
What I have understood so far:
WideString uses UTF16 encoding. It is managed by Windows and so is not
reference counted by Delphi or FPC under Windows. However it is reference
counted by FPC on other platforms.
Then FPC has UnicodeString which is identical with WideString except that it
is
On 28 Dec 2010, at 11:04, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is it possible to get any sort of activity indication that confirms that the
linker is actually doing something useful, rather than just sitting there
locked up?
No, there isn't. FPC currently does not show any output from the linker, but
On Tue, December 28, 2010 11:04, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
On low-spec systems (for example Linux on ARM with 32Mb or Solaris on
SPARC with 128Mb) linking a large project such as the Lazarus IDE can
take several days.
Is it possible to get any sort of activity indication that confirms that
On 28 Dec 2010, at 11:22, Juha Manninen wrote:
What is the difference between the current FPC's UnicodeString and Delphi's
UnicodeString? I am confused with all these string types and encodings.
Delphi's UnicodeString supports holding strings with arbitrary encodings (not
just UTF-16), along
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 28 Dec 2010, at 11:04, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is it possible to get any sort of activity indication that confirms that the
linker is actually doing something useful, rather than just sitting there
locked up?
No, there isn't. FPC currently does not show any output
Hello,
I've started using the TEventLog class and it seems to rewrite any existed
content of the log file instead of append it.
The code uses fmCreate, so I do not understand why it rewrite the content.
is it a bug, or am I missing something ?
Thanks,
Ido
LINESIP - Opening the source for
2010/12/28 Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.fpc-pas...@telemetry.co.uk:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 28 Dec 2010, at 11:04, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is it possible to get any sort of activity indication that confirms that
the linker is actually doing something useful, rather than just sitting
there
Vincent Snijders wrote:
2010/12/28 Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.fpc-pas...@telemetry.co.uk:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 28 Dec 2010, at 11:04, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is it possible to get any sort of activity indication that confirms that
the linker is actually doing something useful, rather than
On 28 Dec 2010, at 12:29, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
FPC works well enough to compile itself on Solaris (as discussed elsewhere)
so I've got no reason to think that things are totally broken. However I've
not got a number of tools that I rely heavily on when running Linux- in
particular
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 28 Dec 2010, at 12:29, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
FPC works well enough to compile itself on Solaris (as discussed elsewhere) so
I've got no reason to think that things are totally broken. However I've not
got a number of tools that I rely heavily on when running Linux-
On 28 Dec 2010, at 13:17, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Thanks, I'd forgotten that site. Tries to tell me that CPU is 0.05 but still
takes 10 secs to login- I'm pretty sure the whole system's thrashing...
[applies ear to case] yup, it's thrashing.
The ld manual page lists some options you can
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, ik wrote:
Hello,
I've started using the TEventLog class and it seems to rewrite any existed
content of the
log file instead of append it.
The code uses fmCreate, so I do not understand why it rewrite the content. is
it a bug, or
am I missing something ?
Using
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 15:06, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.orgwrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, ik wrote:
Hello,
I've started using the TEventLog class and it seems to rewrite any existed
content of the
log file instead of append it.
The code uses fmCreate, so I do not understand
Boris Samorodov wrote:
Hi Mark,
you wrote:
since I've not got GNU Screen
FYI: They say that tmux can be used under Solaris:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg0.html
Thanks Boris, I'll investigate although I must say that I'm being fairly
careful not to
Jonas Maebe wrote:
The ld manual page lists some options you can use to reduce its memory usage:
* --no-keep-memory (makes it re-read object symbol tables from time to time
instead of keeping them in memory all the time)
* --reduce-memory-overheads (small hash tables and slower but less
18 matches
Mail list logo
