On 13/05/2011 00:07, Martin wrote:
On 12/05/2011 23:49, Justin Smyth wrote:
Since upgrading to the lazarus 0.9.31 v30288 x64 ( and win32) i've
noticed the debugging is painfully slow , what use to take only a few
seconds under 0.9.28 now seems to take 20 to 30 seconds
20 to 30 sec, instead of
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:54 PM, cobines cobi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I have written the following program:
program a;
{$mode objfpc}
uses
SysUtils;
var
i: integer;
vd: double;
t: TDateTime;
max: int64;// = 1;
begin
t := Now;
max := 1;
for i := 0 to max
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
I did this test.
My env is FPC 2.4.3 (/fixes_2_4)
Result:
-O = run in 891 ms
-O1 = run in 875 ms
-O2 = run in 1656 ms
-O3 = run in 1625 ms
And now?
Ah, sorry, I use WinXP SP3.
Marcos Douglas
2011/5/13 Ben ben.smith.li...@gmail.com:
On 12/05/2011 20:54, cobines wrote:
I'm running it on Windows XP i386, compiled with FPC 2.5.1 17430.
I tried this on my system which runs 64-bit Linux with FPC 2.4.3 (64-bit).
Using -O, -O2 or -O3 command line parameters. In each case, the
Yesterday I posted an Grammar for a small macro preprocessor with
use of parameters to the developer mailing list. It shows up that is
difficult to work out that it would be useful, to have one.
The question is:
Is there a need or use for a small but full fledged macro
processor?
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:54 AM, cobines cobi...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/13 Ben ben.smith.li...@gmail.com:
On 12/05/2011 20:54, cobines wrote:
I'm running it on Windows XP i386, compiled with FPC 2.5.1 17430.
I tried this on my system which runs 64-bit Linux with FPC 2.4.3 (64-bit).
2011/5/13 Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net:
So, not to use the option -O in i386?
When I compile FPC sources, on Win32 XP SP3, using make, the option is used.
I'm confusing now...
Did you try one of the -Cf options to enable MMX on i386?
Vincent
___
On 13 May 2011, at 16:08, Marcos Douglas wrote:
So, not to use the option -O in i386?
When I compile FPC sources, on Win32 XP SP3, using make, the option
is used.
It is used because in general it results in faster code. This is one
particular example where it doesn't. That does not mean
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Vincent Snijders
vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/13 Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net:
So, not to use the option -O in i386?
When I compile FPC sources, on Win32 XP SP3, using make, the option is used.
I'm confusing now...
Did you try one of the -Cf
Den 13-05-2011 19:54, greim skrev:
next week, Friday, 27th May 2011 there will be the Oberon day at the
ETH in Zürich
Also Niklaus Wirth is speaking so i guess its also interesting here in
the freePascal group.
Do you know if the talks there will be recorded? Could be nice :)
10 matches
Mail list logo
