Reiner,
You can certainly do this with IBX for Lazarus
(http://www.mwasoftware.co.uk). You will also find there some guidelines
on using the Firebird embedded library under both Windows and Linux that
are more general than just IBX.
If you want to stick with SQLDB then there is a global variable
On 1 August 2011 15:09, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
http://code.google.com/speed/webp/
Not yet. But it looks very interesting.
It does indeed. I'm continuing work on adding FPImage support to
fpGUI, and was curious about WebP because I read an article on it
recently.
--
Regards,
-
On 1 August 2011 16:32, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
If you really want the application running 100% of the time, there are only
2 options:
- fastcgi with mod_fastcgi (NOT mod_fcgid) and ExternalFastCGIServer option.
- Embedded server (i;e. the application acts as a webserver).
...and option
On 3-8-2011 9:48, Tony Whyman wrote:
Reiner,
You can certainly do this with IBX for Lazarus
(http://www.mwasoftware.co.uk). You will also find there some guidelines
on using the Firebird embedded library under both Windows and Linux that
are more general than just IBX.
If you want to
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
Not yet. But it looks very interesting.
It does indeed. I'm continuing work on adding FPImage support to
fpGUI, and was curious about WebP because I read an article on it
recently.
If you look around a bit you see also a lot of criticism.
-Message d'origine-
De : fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org
[mailto:fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org] De la part
de Marco van de Voort
Envoyé : mercredi 3 août 2011 11:37
À : FPC-Pascal users discussions
Objet : Re: [fpc-pascal] FPImage and WebP support
In our
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
When using the Firebird embedded database, it's nice to be able to
create the database using only FreePascal/Lazarus.
Why do you think this is not possible ? The CreateDB method of TIBConnection
does exactly that.
I've been using it for years.
Actually, my preference for creating a database in a deployed
application is to first create it on my local system using isql with
input from a script and then to save it using gbak in a portable
format. The TIBRestoreService is then used to create the database from
the backup archive when your
On 3-8-2011 11:50, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
When using the Firebird embedded database, it's nice to be able to
create the database using only FreePascal/Lazarus.
Why do you think this is not possible ? The CreateDB method of
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Tony Whyman wrote:
Actually, my preference for creating a database in a deployed
application is to first create it on my local system using isql with
input from a script and then to save it using gbak in a portable
format. The TIBRestoreService is then used to create the
On 3-8-2011 12:05, Tony Whyman wrote:
Actually, my preference for creating a database in a deployed
application is to first create it on my local system using isql with
input from a script and then to save it using gbak in a portable
format. The TIBRestoreService is then used to create the
Michael,
I will concede that backup/restore is vulnerable to rubbish in/rubbish
out errors. But then if you don't test your backup before distribution
On 03/08/11 11:21, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
As for backup/restore being robust: this is not 100% correct. It is
extremely easy to
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Tony Whyman wrote:
Michael,
I will concede that backup/restore is vulnerable to rubbish in/rubbish
out errors. But then if you don't test your backup before distribution
Yes, of course.
We have checklists and procedures for that when we do updates :-)
I just
On 2-8-2011 7:39, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
I've got trouble finding out how to fill and retrieve data for a
ftVarBytes field in a TBufDataset.
.AsString doesn't seem to work well - if I fill it with the
string How
do I fill this field? I get back
How
I tried SetData,
I understand now what you are doing and would agree that for a simple
demo, you really do want to create the DB in code. I am thinking more
about distributing and supporting a fully supported application.
Interesting that I seemed to get so much push-back when I suggested isql
- I did so as a
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Tony Whyman wrote:
I understand now what you are doing and would agree that for a simple
demo, you really do want to create the DB in code. I am thinking more
about distributing and supporting a fully supported application.
Interesting that I seemed to get so much
On 3-8-2011 12:38, Tony Whyman wrote:
I understand now what you are doing and would agree that for a simple
demo, you really do want to create the DB in code. I am thinking more
about distributing and supporting a fully supported application.
Interesting that I seemed to get so much
On 3-8-2011 12:32, Ludo Brands wrote:
On 2-8-2011 7:39, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
I've got trouble finding out how to fill and retrieve data for a
ftVarBytes field in a TBufDataset.
TestDataset.FieldByName('ftVarBytes').Asstring := Teststring;
writeln('ftVarbytes.AsString: ' +
Hi,
I searched the FPC Programmer's Guide and Users Guide, and nowhere is
there a definitional of description explaining the difference.
So here is to anybody that knows: What is the difference between a
target x86-64, target x86_64 and a target x64?
eg:
Here is the output of my FPC compiler
Hi,
I know when deploying an application, it is always best to be
conservative with the compiler optimization options - thus your
application can run on most CPU's out there (maximum compatibility).
But what is the best optimization options I can specify for my own
system. This includes FPC
On 3 August 2011 11:36, Marco van de Voort wrote:
If you look around a bit you see also a lot of criticism. On the results of
Google's tests, and the incompleteness of the reference implementation.
...
And of course browser support is still seriously lacking.
None the less it is still
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
I searched the FPC Programmer's Guide and Users Guide, and nowhere is
there a definitional of description explaining the difference.
So here is to anybody that knows: What is the difference between a
target x86-64, target x86_64 and a target
On 03 Aug 2011, at 14:11, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
So here is to anybody that knows: What is the difference between a
target x86-64, target x86_64 and a target x64?
None. The target names are simple strings in the compiler/i_*.pas
files and unrelated to the code generation.
Jonas
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
Google's tests, and the incompleteness of the reference implementation.
...
And of course browser support is still seriously lacking.
None the less it is still interesting. Google trying to bring a new
image format into today's times - it
Hi list,
I'm looking into converting a half-finished small timekeeping/billing
application of mine from .Net to Lazarus/Freepascal. It runs on SQL
Server 2008.
I'm thinking about trying to separate out the database layer (using
something like tiOPF perhaps) from the presentation layer.
I could
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 August 2011 16:32, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
If you really want the application running 100% of the time, there are only
2 options:
- fastcgi with mod_fastcgi (NOT mod_fcgid) and ExternalFastCGIServer
You can use L7 filtering to select actions based on packet content.
2011/8/1 Andrew Brunner andrew.t.brun...@gmail.com:
The only thing I can think of would be packet inspection. Firewalls
included with Linux and Windows do not perform deep packet
inspection. They only allow/deny packets with
In our previous episode, Andrew Brunner said:
The only thing I can think of would be packet inspection. Firewalls
included with Linux and Windows do not perform deep packet
inspection. They only allow/deny packets with specific ports over
either TCP or UDP.
Usually they deny all ports by
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
Hi list,
I'm looking into converting a half-finished small timekeeping/billing
application of mine from .Net to Lazarus/Freepascal. It runs on SQL
Server 2008.
I'm thinking about trying to separate out the database layer (using
something like
29 matches
Mail list logo
