Thanks, stootch, sorry it did not work.
You might try with a newer version; we have found and hopefully fixed some
problems with lazarus make...
Thanks for the detailed problem report,
ReinierOn 13-02-12 21:15 stootch wrote:
W dniu 2012-02-10 15:24, Reinier Olislagers pisze:
Testing on
doesn't generics more or less duplicate the class every time you use it with
different type, and if so would this not cause alot of bloating ?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:45, Carver413 carver...@gmail.com wrote:
doesn't generics more or less duplicate the class every time you use it
with
different type, and if so would this not cause alot of bloating ?
That's one of the things that I'm afraid of actually.
Am 14.02.2012 06:45, schrieb Carver413:
doesn't generics more or less duplicate the class every time you use it with
different type, and if so would this not cause alot of bloating ?
Yes it does. So for embedded systems use with care ;)
Regards,
Sven
2012/2/14, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com:
Am 14.02.2012 06:45, schrieb Carver413:
doesn't generics more or less duplicate the class every time you use it
with
different type, and if so would this not cause alot of bloating ?
Yes it does. So for embedded systems use with care ;)
Oh,
On 14.02.2012 19:33, Juha Manninen wrote:
2012/2/14, Sven Barthpascaldra...@googlemail.com:
Am 14.02.2012 06:45, schrieb Carver413:
doesn't generics more or less duplicate the class every time you use it
with
different type, and if so would this not cause alot of bloating ?
Yes it does. So
As long as one knows of the disadvantages of generics there is no
problem in enjoying their advantages.
the disadvantage will come in the useing. over time more and more units will
contain these because they are easy. so you will end up with a lot of redundant
code. doesn't matter if they
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
in a container, the same container could be used.
Such logic unnecessarily complicates the compiler. Generics are already
troublesome enough.
Afaik it was the main reason to implement generic constraints in Delphi (like
.NET)?
On 14.02.2012 22:03, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
in a container, the same container could be used.
Such logic unnecessarily complicates the compiler. Generics are already
troublesome enough.
Afaik it was the main reason to implement generic
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
Afaik it was the main reason to implement generic constraints in Delphi
(like
.NET)?
Constraints allow the compiler to infer further information on the given
types to improve e.g. type checking when parsing the generic,
Exactly. You e.g. know
W dniu 2012-02-14 10:41, reinierolislag...@gmail.com pisze:
You might try with a newer version; we have found and hopefully fixed some
problems with lazarus make...
Um...
Info: make FPC=/home/stootch/fpc/bin/fpc.sh
--directory=/home/stootch/lazarus FPCDIR=/home/stootch/fpc/
UPXPROG=echo
i once read a textbook about generics (C++ generics) showing how C++
code can end up being FASTER than C equivalent due to lack of type
checks...
it uses a quick sort routing as example.
on C you end up having to check the type of storage to get a similar
result, while on C++ you check this at
12 matches
Mail list logo
