On Wed, October 10, 2012 04:16, waldo kitty wrote:
On 10/8/2012 03:12, Tomas Hajny wrote:
The manual forgets to mention that this is only the case on Win32 (where
the various GNU tools and utilities are included with the FPC
installation
package). It also doesn't mention that different
Does FPC ensure the same memory alignment for records and objects
over different platforms? If I want to be sure to have the same
alignment must I use packed (with possibly some aligning assigned)
records instead in combination with data types that are guaranteed to be
of the same size over
On 10 Oct 2012, at 12:02, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
Does FPC ensure the same memory alignment for records and objects
over different platforms?
No, alignment is defined by the platform ABI.
If I want to be sure to have the same
alignment must I use packed (with possibly some aligning
Am 10.10.2012 12:02, schrieb dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl:
Does FPC ensure the same memory alignment for records and objects over
different platforms? If I want to be sure to have the same alignment
must I use packed (with possibly some aligning assigned) records instead
in combination with data
On 10 okt '12, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 10.10.2012 12:02, schrieb
dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl: [1]
Does FPC ensure the same memory
alignment for records and objects over different platforms? If I want to
be sure to have the same alignment must I use packed (with possibly some
aligning assigned)
On 10 okt '12, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 10 Oct 2012, at 12:02,
dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl [1] wrote:
Does FPC ensure the same
memory alignment for records and objects
over different platforms?
No, alignment is defined by the platform ABI.
If I want to be
sure to have the same
On 10 Oct 2012, at 14:31, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
Jonas and Sven... Endianess is indeed an issue I will be handling.
It's
my understanding now that by storing data in a packed record I will
have
the same behaviour (when it comes to aligning data in memory) over all
platforms and
On 10.10.12 14:40, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
One more question, when using packed records, is there anything to say
about performance? Are there some tests anywhere that show how the
performance is impacted?
This highly depends on the architecture/processor.
Many architectures (like
Sven Barth wrote:
Am 10.10.2012 12:02, schrieb dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl:
Does FPC ensure the same memory alignment for records and objects over
different platforms? If I want to be sure to have the same alignment
must I use packed (with possibly some aligning assigned) records instead
in
2012/10/10 dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl:
However when
objects have methods, does that change memory alignment
No. As long as there are no virtual methods it will not affect the
size or the memory layout. From what I have read the new gtk3 API for
fpc will also use objects (with methods and also
Hi List,
I've started working on porting msgpack (messagepack.org) to native
FreePascal code: (https://github.com/ik5/fp-msgpack).
If you do not know it, then it's a way to move data around with
minimal amount of bytes in process.
It was designed to take things like JSON and translate it into
The Lazarus team is glad to announce the release of Lazarus 1.0.2.
This is a bug fix release. Here is the list of changes:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_1.0_fixes_branch#Fixes_for_1.0.2_.28Merged.29
The release is available for download at the SourceForge download page:
12 matches
Mail list logo
