RE: [fpc-pascal] Free Pascal 2.6.2 rc1

2012-11-28 Thread Pierre Free Pascal
It was indeed, and is now also on freppascal.stacl.nl. I installed the fpc-2.6.2rc1.i386-win95.exe successfully on a virtual windows 95 box. The only problem is the IDE which doesn’t work because I used a wrong libgdb version that uses CancelIo win32 API function which is not

Re: [fpc-pascal] Free Pascal 2.6.2 rc1

2012-11-28 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Bart said: I have uploaded a fpc-2.6.2rc1.i386-win95.exe ,in the same directory beta/2.6.2-rc1/i386-win32, that was generated using -dSUPPORT_WIN95 option and inno setup 5. You mean fpc has win95 support? I thought only win98/winme were still supported?

Re: [fpc-pascal] Free Pascal 2.6.2 rc1

2012-11-28 Thread Bart
On 11/28/12, Pierre Free Pascal pie...@freepascal.org wrote: It was indeed, and is now also on freppascal.stacl.nl. I successfully installed the win95 version and managed to rebuild Lazarus with it, so I guess it's OK. Bart ___ fpc-pascal maillist

[fpc-pascal] problem with command line defines??

2012-11-28 Thread waldo kitty
on OS/2 eCS2 i have fpc 2.6.0 release installed... i've been working with a library and needed to create a define so that some code would be compiled that otherwise is not... since i have to compile from the command line with fpc, i compiled my project like this... fpc -dOS2GCC testhttp

Re: [fpc-pascal] problem with command line defines??

2012-11-28 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 28 Nov 2012, at 19:22, waldo kitty wrote: on OS/2 eCS2 i have fpc 2.6.0 release installed... i've been working with a library and needed to create a define so that some code would be compiled that otherwise is not... since i have to compile from the command line with fpc, i compiled my

Re: [fpc-pascal] problem with command line defines??

2012-11-28 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Wed, November 28, 2012 19:39, Jonas Maebe wrote: On 28 Nov 2012, at 19:22, waldo kitty wrote: on OS/2 eCS2 i have fpc 2.6.0 release installed... i've been working with a library and needed to create a define so that some code would be compiled that otherwise is not... since i have to

Re: [fpc-pascal] problem with command line defines??

2012-11-28 Thread waldo kitty
On 11/28/2012 13:55, Tomas Hajny wrote: On Wed, November 28, 2012 19:39, Jonas Maebe wrote: Changing defines does not cause recompilation of units because e.g. the defines required to compile the FPC RTL or packages are completely unrelated to any defines that may or may not be required for

Re: [fpc-pascal] problem with command line defines??

2012-11-28 Thread waldo kitty
On 11/28/2012 13:55, Tomas Hajny wrote: In other words - it is normal, but you can solve it without manually deleting the created *.o and *.ppu files by using the -B parameter (which asks fpc to rebuild all units for which it has sources with the new command line parameters including