Hi,
I need to save some huge XML files in HD.
Today I call WriteXMLFile(Doc, AFileName) but I have XML with 5G, 10G.. 30G...
What the best way to save line by line?
Regards,
Marcos Douglas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Le 18/06/2013 14:35, Marcos Douglas a
écrit :
Hi,
I need to save some huge XML files in HD.
Today I call WriteXMLFile(Doc, AFileName) but I have XML with 5G, 10G.. 30G...
What the best way to save "line by line"?
Append chuncks of lines to a
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Antonio Fortuny
a.fort...@sitasoftware.lu wrote:
Le 18/06/2013 14:35, Marcos Douglas a écrit :
Hi,
I need to save some huge XML files in HD.
Today I call WriteXMLFile(Doc, AFileName) but I have XML with 5G, 10G.. 30G...
What the best way to save line by
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Antonio Fortuny
a.fort...@sitasoftware.lu wrote:
Le 18/06/2013 14:35, Marcos Douglas a écrit :
Hi,
I need to save some huge XML files in HD.
Today I call WriteXMLFile(Doc, AFileName) but I have XML with 5G, 10G..
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Antonio Fortuny
a.fort...@sitasoftware.lu wrote:
Le 18/06/2013 14:35, Marcos Douglas a écrit :
Hi,
I need to save some huge
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
No. The writer already uses a fixed buffer. Your problem is the use of
TXMLDocument.
Ideas? Maybe do what Antonio Fortuny said before?
Simply put: logging to XML (worse: using DOM) is a VERY bad idea.
Well, this is a request of my client.
Le 18/06/2013 15:42, Marcos Douglas a
écrit :
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Antonio Fortuny
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
No. The writer already uses a fixed buffer. Your problem is the use of
TXMLDocument.
Ideas? Maybe do what Antonio Fortuny said before?
Simply put: logging to
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Fortuny
a.fort...@sitasoftware.lu wrote:
Le 18/06/2013 15:42, Marcos Douglas a écrit :
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:39 AM,
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
No. The writer already uses a fixed buffer. Your problem is the use of
TXMLDocument.
Ideas? Maybe do what Antonio
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Ideas? Maybe do what Antonio Fortuny said before?
Yep, a text file: assign, reset, append, close. I use an own build logger
facility (for historical reasons) but I wonder whether Lazarus (or FPC)
does not have such a logger component.
Ok, thank
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
No. The writer already uses a
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
wrote:
Regardles of XML or not: keeping logs in memory is simply a bad idea.
Log it to a csv file, and at the end you can convert it to xml for your
client, you can do that without loading it into memory, process it
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
But in that way I will have two process to run.
I'll write a XML using strings... but thank you.
one process, but in function like TXMLLogger.Finish you can convert it,
using strings in memory, it will eat your memory.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Zaher Dirkey parm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
But in that way I will have two process to run.
I'll write a XML using strings... but thank you.
one process, but in function like
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Zaher Dirkey parm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
But in that way I will have two process to run.
I'll write a XML using strings... but thank you.
On 18.06.2013 16:01, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
No. The writer already uses a fixed buffer. Your problem is the use
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
On 18.06.2013 16:01, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
No. The writer already
On 18.06.2013 19:18, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
On 18.06.2013 16:01, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013,
On 18/06/13 18:42, leledumbo wrote:
well, to be honest, int hahaha[10] - hahaha: array[0..9] of integer;
it is not just adding 0..
anyway, a change in the converter should be more adequate, IMHO, that by
default translates [X] into [0 .. X-1]
just my 2c
I think this was requested a
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
root
connection login=uref database=DB_REF/
start dh=2013-06-18T13:54:57/
line idDoc=912 status=ok/
line idDoc=913 status=ok/
line idDoc=914 status=ok/
line...
finish
As for easy migration from C, do you really
think removing 0 .. (approximately 4 characters) is a benefit?
Yes of course. In large programs it is helping you to be correct all the time
when migrating code. See also the statement of Alberto.
anyway, a change in the converter should be more
Am 18.06.2013 22:02, schrieb Rainer Stratmann:
As for easy migration from C, do you really
think removing 0 .. (approximately 4 characters) is a benefit?
Yes of course. In large programs it is helping you to be correct all the time
when migrating code. See also the statement of Alberto.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Zaher Dirkey parm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
root
connection login=uref database=DB_REF/
start dh=2013-06-18T13:54:57/
line idDoc=912 status=ok/
line
On Tuesday 18 June 2013 22:10:51 you wrote:
Am 18.06.2013 22:02, schrieb Rainer Stratmann:
As for easy migration from C, do you really
think removing 0 .. (approximately 4 characters) is a benefit?
Yes of course. In large programs it is helping you to be correct all the
time when
On 18 Jun 2013, at 22:22, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Yes that is with all kind of information if you don't have backgrund
knowledge.
Minimising the amount of required background knowledge and making everything
self-explanatory is a fundamental part of the Pascal philosophy.
As reading your
On Tuesday 18 June 2013 22:28:44 you wrote:
On 18 Jun 2013, at 22:22, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Yes that is with all kind of information if you don't have backgrund
knowledge.
Minimising the amount of required background knowledge and making
everything self-explanatory is a fundamental
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:06:46 +0200
Rainer Stratmann rainerstratm...@t-online.de wrote:
For some days I have the mikroPascal Compiler from Mikroelektronika.
And I am satisfied with it.
http://www.mikroe.com/mikropascal/avr
With that product the declaration of an array is also possible with
C to Pascal converters have this goal.
Hum, do you know some good Pascal 2 C converter ?
Yes, the world change in the past i was looking for good C2Pas or h2Pas, now i
need Pas2C converters...
___
fpc-pascal
On Tuesday 18 June 2013 23:47:11 you wrote:
For making porting code from other Pascal compilers easier fpc supports
the modes (Delphi, TP, MacPas, ...). Do you think it is worth to add a
new mikroPascal mode or modeswitch?
Don't think that complicated.
For this 'revolutionary' feature there
C to Pascal converters have this goal.
Hum, do you know some good Pascal 2 C converter ?
Yes, the world change in the past i was looking for good C2Pas or h2Pas, now
i need Pas2C converters...
Hum, to clarify, i need a Pas 2 C converter, not
then you'll need to write a wrapper around it which could
for example utilize the -vq option to display a message id in front of
each message the compiler writes.
Hello everybody.
I have finish the first part of sak (speecher assistive kit) for fpc.
LCL and fpGUI are now totally
32 matches
Mail list logo
