Re: [fpc-pascal] Free pascal 1.0.6

On Fri, July 12, 2013 20:33, Sven Barth wrote: > On 11.07.2013 22:14, Matúš Kudláč wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> I want to use Free Pascal 1.0.6 in windows XP Professional 32bit. I >> know to ask some questions about that. Are there some stability problems >> with that version(compiler, IDE, debugger

Re: [fpc-pascal] Free pascal 1.0.6

On 11.07.2013 22:14, Matúš Kudláč wrote: Hi, I want to use Free Pascal 1.0.6 in windows XP Professional 32bit. I know to ask some questions about that. Are there some stability problems with that version(compiler, IDE, debugger, ...)? If there are can I make some changes to make it stable(

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Free pascal 1.0.6

In our previous episode, Tomas Hajny said: > > I want to know if there are some stability problems with this version and > > all of its parts(IDE, compiler, debugger). I mean problems like crashing, > > freezing, > > Well, you haven't mentioned anything about the platform you plan to use, > e

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Free pascal 1.0.6

Yes, I plan to use the Win32 release and compile for the Win32 target. On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote: > On Fri, July 12, 2013 18:59, Matúš Kudláč wrote: > > I plan to use windows xp professional 32bit. > > I.e. you plan to use the Win32 release and compile for the Win32 tar

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Free pascal 1.0.6

On Fri, July 12, 2013 18:59, Matúš Kudláč wrote: > I plan to use windows xp professional 32bit. I.e. you plan to use the Win32 release and compile for the Win32 target, right? Just to make sure that you didn't have different plans like compiling for the GO32v2 target as an example... Tomas

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Free pascal 1.0.6

I plan to use windows xp professional 32bit. On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote: > On Fri, July 12, 2013 17:29, Matúš Kudláč wrote: > > I want to know if there are some stability problems with this version and > > all of its parts(IDE, compiler, debugger). I mean problems like c

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: JVM backend and language restrictions

Am 11.07.2013 23:44, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys: > On 2013-07-11 20:20, Florian Klaempfl wrote: >> >> Is it so hard to google "fpc jvm language limitations" ? > > > Yes, especially if your internet has been down for 3/4 of the day [2 > days in a row]. > So there is an offline wiki? _

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Free pascal 1.0.6

On Fri, July 12, 2013 17:29, Matúš Kudláč wrote: > I want to know if there are some stability problems with this version and > all of its parts(IDE, compiler, debugger). I mean problems like crashing, > freezing, Well, you haven't mentioned anything about the platform you plan to use, etc. In

[fpc-pascal] Re: Free pascal 1.0.6

On 12-7-2013 5:29, Matúš Kudláč wrote: > I want to know if there are some stability problems with this version > and all of its parts(IDE, compiler, debugger). I mean problems like > crashing, freezing, I think people have been trying to tell you that there may well be stability problems etc.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Free pascal 1.0.6

I want to know if there are some stability problems with this version and all of its parts(IDE, compiler, debugger). I mean problems like crashing, freezing, On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Matúš Kudláč wrote: > No I really mean free pascal 1.0.6. > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mar

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Free pascal 1.0.6

No I really mean free pascal 1.0.6. On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote: > In our previous episode, leledumbo said: > > Older versions are never free of bugs (that's one of the reason why the > next > > version appears), and even worse, it looks like there's no trace of bu

[fpc-pascal] MAC window creation / Management / OpenGL

Hi, I need to knew who to create a window under OSX and handle menu. Also it would be nice to init OpenGL. No GLUT, NSGL would be fine. need a complete example! no snippets! I'm complitly new on OSX, so sorry for lameness :)  thx for Help. -> Kirill Kranz_

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: [Lazarus] Should TObject or TComponent have a Comment property?

On 2013-07-12 10:48, vfclists . wrote: > > Anyway I am not talking about documentation as such, just a property that > an object can be queried about on its role, ie: class documentation :) Regards, G. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lis

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: [Lazarus] Should TObject or TComponent have a Comment property?

On 12 July 2013 09:09, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > On 2013-07-12 07:07, vfclists . wrote: > > Coding time is the best > > time for documentation because that is when the intent of the code is > clear > > and fresh in the developers mind, and incurs minimal additional cost. > > > And you just said

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: JVM backend and language restrictions

On 07/11/2013 07:06 PM, waldo kitty wrote: i like the "what links here" links but have never seen a "this links where" one that shows the other pages the current one links to... you gotta already be on the page to find out what links to it but ya can't go the other way around... Funny that th

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: [Lazarus] Should TObject or TComponent have a Comment property?

On 2013-07-12 07:07, vfclists . wrote: > Coding time is the best > time for documentation because that is when the intent of the code is clear > and fresh in the developers mind, and incurs minimal additional cost. And you just said it yourself. If the developer of the code doesn't even have the

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: [Lazarus] Should TObject or TComponent have a Comment property?

>Enough digression - if considered carefully a comment about the purpose of an object belongs in the object definition itself. I use Pasdoc for that On 07/12/2013 08:07 AM, vfclists . wrote: On 11 July 2013 23:07, Benito van der Zander > wrote: Annotations

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Free pascal 1.0.6

In our previous episode, leledumbo said: > Older versions are never free of bugs (that's one of the reason why the next > version appears), and even worse, it looks like there's no trace of bug > reports for version as old as 1.0.6 (>10 years). Just try everything > yourself, and if something is wr

Re: [fpc-pascal] Should TObject or TComponent have a Comment property?

On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, vfclists . wrote: Should TObject or TComponent have a Comment property? I think they should. One for the design itself and one for describing the usage at design or runtime. No. It takes memory and needs management. Putting this in a basic class such as TComponent is