On 30/08/2013 07:44, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 29.08.2013 23:04 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt
michael-y8GAwIkqPAJpn7uciFS/b...@public.gmane.org
mailto:michael-y8GAwIkqPAJpn7uciFS/b...@public.gmane.org:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, silvioprog wrote:
Other interesting feature is the property EmptyAsNull:
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 29.08.2013 23:04 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, silvioprog wrote:
Other interesting feature is the property EmptyAsNull:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Not everywhere. In Oracle empty strings are Null (which is why we have
special code for this situation in our business
application).
That's a deviation from the standard. NULL means we don't know, empty
means we know it is empty
Actually, it means we don't know
I would assumed so because of the existence of Firemonkey for Delphi and
Xamarin for C#.
I asked this questions because I wrote a FREE (without advertisement)
app with Free Pascal.
The app was about Acupuncture (Chinese medicine) and was in Chinese
interface only and I submitted to the Apple
Hey,
I just signed the petition Speaker of the Lok Sabha Shrimati Meira Kumar: Send
the RTI (Amendment) Bill, 2013 to a Standing Committee/Select Committee and
wanted to see if you could help by adding your name.
Our goal is to reach 15,000 signatures and we need more support. You can read
On 08/30/2013 01:23 PM, Dennis Poon wrote:
No wonder there are many categories in which Android has Free (or
paid) apps but IOS does not.
AFAIK, Apple keeps a decent share of the price of any APP sold in the shop.
So it's no wonder they are not at all interested in free Apps.
-Michael
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 19:23:18 +0800
Dennis Poon den...@avidsoft.com.hk wrote:
Frankly, I was unhappy and I replied:
It is a FREE App without advertisement or anything. I don't get any
reward from this app. I am mere contributing my time and effort and bore
the Developer License fee of
Frankly, I don't like Apple. They have become arrogant and stubborn like
Microsoft and old Sony and (the old IBM).
Remember Sony used to have this special type of SD card (Called Memory
stick ) which are so different from other SD, MMC and they forced you to
buy them (at much higher priced than
On 30 Aug 2013, at 14:24, Dennis Poon wrote:
Frankly, I don't like Apple. They have become arrogant and stubborn
like Microsoft and old Sony and (the old IBM).
[snip]
Please take that kind of remarks/discussion to the fpc-other list.
Thanks.
Jonas
FPC mailing lists admin
2013/8/29 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, silvioprog wrote:
Other interesting feature is the property EmptyAsNull:
http://docwiki.embarcadero.**com/VCL/XE/en/IBCustomDataSet.**
Hi,
a longer time ago, i've installed lazarus on my raspberry pi with
wheezy. The fpc version was 2.6.0-xxx
I could compile without any problem.
Today I've downloaded fpc 2.6.2 and installed it.
But now I have problems with the linker:
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.6.2 [2013/02/15] for
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, silvioprog wrote:
2013/8/29 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, silvioprog wrote:
Other interesting feature is the property EmptyAsNull:
2013/8/30 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, silvioprog wrote:
2013/8/29 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, silvioprog wrote:
Other interesting feature is the property EmptyAsNull:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 03:44:35PM +0200, Stefan Fischer wrote:
Hi,
a longer time ago, i've installed lazarus on my raspberry pi with
wheezy. The fpc version was 2.6.0-xxx
I could compile without any problem.
Today I've downloaded fpc 2.6.2 and installed it.
But now I have problems
On 30.08.2013 15:42, silvioprog wrote:
2013/8/29 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
mailto:mich...@freepascal.org
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, silvioprog wrote:
Other interesting feature is the property EmptyAsNull:
Ok, if I want to build a 2.7.1 cross-arm-wince (or any other cross),
then I first need a native fpc (in my case a win32-i386)
Does the native compiler have to be (or should it be):
* 2.6.2
* 2.7.1 of the same revision
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
On 30.08.2013 20:26, Martin wrote:
Ok, if I want to build a 2.7.1 cross-arm-wince (or any other cross),
then I first need a native fpc (in my case a win32-i386)
Does the native compiler have to be (or should it be):
* 2.6.2
* 2.7.1 of the same revision
AFAIK both variants should be ok.
17 matches
Mail list logo