On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 08.01.2014 22:01, schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
You can preview the result at
http://www.freepascal.org/~michael/ref/refch3.html
You might additionally mention that these type aliases also allow different
operator and (AFAIK also) function overloads.
On 08/01/2014 20:38, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Reinier Olislagers reinierolislag...@gmail.com schrieb:
On 08/01/2014 18:01, Pierre Free Pascal wrote:
-Message d'origine-
De : fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org [mailto:fpc-pascal-
boun...@lists.freepascal.org] De la part de Reinier
On 09 Jan 2014, at 03:08, Xiangrong Fang wrote:
I would like to know what is the difference between AnsiStrscan and
strscan, or, generically, the Ansi* functions versus non-ansi
versions?
In general, the difference between Ansi* functions and non-ansi
versions is that the Ansi* versions
On 08 Jan 2014, at 19:37, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 08/01/2014 17:17, Jonas Maebe wrote:
The codepage names used by the codepage directive are
(unfortunately, I
guess) unrelated to the code page numbers:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progsu88.html
They are the names of
On 09/01/2014 15:12, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 09/01/2014 14:49, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 08 Jan 2014, at 19:37, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 08/01/2014 17:17, Jonas Maebe wrote:
I see your point, but I think that people should just regularly
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 09/01/2014 15:12, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 09/01/2014 14:49, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 08 Jan 2014, at 19:37, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 08/01/2014 17:17, Jonas Maebe wrote:
I see your
On 09/01/2014 15:43, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 09/01/2014 15:12, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 09/01/2014 14:49, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 08 Jan 2014, at 19:37, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On
Am 09.01.2014 14:49, schrieb Jonas Maebe:
On 08 Jan 2014, at 19:37, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 08/01/2014 17:17, Jonas Maebe wrote:
The codepage names used by the codepage directive are (unfortunately, I
guess) unrelated to the code page numbers:
Am 2014-01-09 08:26, schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
That what should be declared is repeated in the declaration
itself which makes no sense to me.
A syntax diagram for 'type declaration' (which is written in the heading
already)
The heading is a caption.
In typesetting, normally that is not
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.comwrote:
Am 08.01.2014 22:01, schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
You can preview the result at
http://www.freepascal.org/~michael/ref/refch3.html
You might additionally mention that these type aliases also allow
different
What is the recommended way to profile FPC applications run on ARM targets
in light of the error message:
Fatal: Option -pg is not, or not yet, supported on the current target
platform
when I try to compile for the ARM target?
Regards, Bruce.
___
On 10.01.2014 00:32, Constantine Yannakopoulos wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com
mailto:pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 08.01.2014 22:01, schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
You can preview the result at
I'm writing a web app hosting several tasks in FPC, however one of the task
is calling a function residing in a .NET dll. I've made a flat C interface
for the dll (so that I can call it from FPC easily), and it works just fine
IF the dll is somehow loaded first. Currently, I use a trick to debug
13 matches
Mail list logo
