[fpc-pascal] [fcl-web] [fphttpserver] what should pathinfo contain?

2014-01-19 Thread leledumbo
I recently has a problem with Brook where every request except default fails and when I debug, I see that pathinfo always has the same content as host. Is this correct? Because AFAIK it should contain host + URI. In the fcl-web flow, before processing host: header, pathinfo does contain URI. FPC r

Re: [fpc-pascal] Optimisation : X+X or 2*X or X*2 ?

2014-01-19 Thread Nikolay Nikolov
On 01/19/2014 10:45 PM, Sven Barth wrote: On 19.01.2014 20:47, Ched wrote: Dear Freepascalers, The multiplication in floating arthmetic units is usualy know as being slower than the addition. So, have I interest to code X+X, 2*X or X*2 when using reals (mainly double and extended) ?And with int

Re: [fpc-pascal] Optimisation : X+X or 2*X or X*2 ?

2014-01-19 Thread Charles Edouard Des Vastes-Vignes
That is right for positive integers. But for floating point numbers ? Cheers, Raoul Le 19 janv. 2014 21:23, "Philippe" a écrit : > forgot > > X shl 1 > > normaly the fastest ... > > > > Em 19.01.2014 17:47, Ched escreveu: > > Dear Freepascalers, > > The multiplication in floating arthmetic unit

Re: [fpc-pascal] Optimisation : X+X or 2*X or X*2 ?

2014-01-19 Thread Sven Barth
On 19.01.2014 20:47, Ched wrote: Dear Freepascalers, The multiplication in floating arthmetic units is usualy know as being slower than the addition. So, have I interest to code X+X, 2*X or X*2 when using reals (mainly double and extended) ?And with integers ? Can't really comment on floats, b

Re: [fpc-pascal] Optimisation : X+X or 2*X or X*2 ?

2014-01-19 Thread Sven Barth
On 19.01.2014 21:07, Philippe wrote: forgot X shl 1 normaly the fastest ... But only for ints, not floating point values. Regards, Sven ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf

Re: [fpc-pascal] Optimisation : X+X or 2*X or X*2 ?

2014-01-19 Thread Philippe
forgot X shl 1 normaly the fastest ... Em 19.01.2014 17:47, Ched escreveu: > Dear Freepascalers, > > The multiplication in floating arthmetic units is usualy know as being slower than the addition. So, have > I interest to code X+X, 2*X or X*2 when using reals (mainly double and extend

[fpc-pascal] Optimisation : X+X or 2*X or X*2 ?

2014-01-19 Thread Ched
Dear Freepascalers, The multiplication in floating arthmetic units is usualy know as being slower than the addition. So, have I interest to code X+X, 2*X or X*2 when using reals (mainly double and extended) ?And with integers ? Can the compiler optimise this operation choosing the fastest one