On 23.03.2015 21:39, Andrew Haines wrote:
Hi,
Do the new class helpers support objects?
If this is not implemented how much work (1-10) is it to do?
No, it's currently not supported, but it wouldn't be that hard to add.
In fact that's somewhere on my ToDo list as well as helpers for interfac
Hi,
Do the new class helpers support objects?
If this is not implemented how much work (1-10) is it to do?
Thanks,
Andrew
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:13:54 +
"vfclists ." wrote:
>[...]
> More questions on Mode Delphi.
>
> 1. Does Mode Delphi simply allow Delphi syntax to be compiled, or does it
> also affect the code generation, like data structures, pointer handling,
> parameter handling / calling conventions, stac
On 18 March 2015 at 14:49, vfclists . wrote:
>
> I have recently compiled projects which were converted from Delphi and it
> seems to me that the passing a function as a parameter does not require the
> '@' symbol. I suspect syntax errors came because I wasn't compiling from
> the command line.
>
Michael Schnell wrote:
On 03/20/2015 11:09 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Efficient implementation of coroutines requires CPU-specific code in
the RTL and possibly the compiler. However
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/coroutines.html suggests a
way that coroutines can be implemented
On 03/20/2015 11:09 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Efficient implementation of coroutines requires CPU-specific code in
the RTL and possibly the compiler. However
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/coroutines.html suggests a
way that coroutines can be implemented in a portable fashion in
On 03/21/2015 11:04 AM, Constantine Yannakopoulos wrote:
So no ambiguity,
As - other than in C - calling a function without empty parentheses is
allowed (and rather common, FWIW), this _is_ an ambiguity.
-Michael
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pas
