On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Maciej Izak wrote:
sadly - no, only in Delphi mode.
On 2015-07-15 19:58, David Emerson wrote:
Any example code that shows the power of interfaces or
TAggregatedObject in a somewhat useful example?
The best Interfaces usage I've ever seen was done by Joanna Carter with
her MVP implementation. The articles and source code is available on my
Thanks, Graeme and Sven!
On 07/14/2015 11:05 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Not related to your problem, but important nevertheless: you don't need
to free interface variables. They are reference counted and freed
automatically at least if you don't mix a class reference (in your case
to t_foo_base) and
Hi,
Is there some way to write this:
type
generic ICloneableT = interface
function Clone: T;
end;
...using this sintaxe:
type
ICloneableT = interface
function Clone: T;
end;
Because I would like to use:
TFoo = class(ICloneableTFoo)
...instead use:
TFoo = class(specialize
sadly - no, only in Delphi mode. btw. this thing keep me away from objfpc.
2015-07-16 15:34 GMT+02:00 Marcos Douglas:
Hi,
Is there some way to write this:
Best regards
Maciej Izak
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Maciej Izak wrote:
sadly - no, only in Delphi mode. btw. this thing keep me away from objfpc.
That seems like a very strange reason to
On 16.07.2015 18:02, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Maciej Izak wrote:
sadly - no, only in Delphi mode. btw. this thing keep me away from objfpc.
That seems like a very strange reason to me.
On 16.07.2015 17:53, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Sven Barth
pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 16.07.2015 16:34 schrieb Maciej Izak hnb.c...@gmail.com:
sadly - no, only in Delphi mode. btw. this thing keep me away from objfpc.
Then let me tell you that
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Sven Barth
pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 16.07.2015 16:34 schrieb Maciej Izak hnb.c...@gmail.com:
sadly - no, only in Delphi mode. btw. this thing keep me away from objfpc.
Then let me tell you that generic methods will arrive in mode ObjFPC (and
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Maciej Izak wrote:
sadly - no, only in Delphi mode. btw. this thing keep me away from objfpc.
That seems like a very strange reason to me.
The fact that you must type 1 word in
On 2015-07-16 16:53, Marcos Douglas wrote:
I would like to know why exists this difference, what the advantages
for mode objfpc using this syntax.
Michael already answered that.
It is meant to help you, to make explicit you are in fact specializing
a new type.
The objfpc mode is normally more
On 2015-07-16 17:02, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Sometimes the IDE shows an error in interface declaration, but compiles.
So, to not receive these errors I have to create a new type:
So, that is then a bug in Lazarus's codetools or parser - report it for
the Lazarus project.
Regards,
- Graeme -
On 16.07.2015 19:21, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The whole generics mess that Delphi made goes completely against the
Pascal dictum that you must declare something before you can use it.
To me, the above verbose construction makes absolute sense. It has been
so since day 1:
PRecord = ^TRecord;
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, silvioprog wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 16.07.2015 18:02, Marcos Douglas wrote:
[...]
Yes, but do you think this is more verbose unnecessarily? Because the
syntax TFooT (I mean this ) show us that is a generic, don't?
This might be the case for a
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
sadly - no, only in Delphi mode. btw. this thing keep me away from objfpc.
Then let me tell you that generic methods will arrive in mode ObjFPC (and
thus its syntax) first, because the Delphi syntax is a PITA to parse/handle.
https://xkcd.com/927/
On 16.07.2015 21:04, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
sadly - no, only in Delphi mode. btw. this thing keep me away from objfpc.
Then let me tell you that generic methods will arrive in mode ObjFPC (and
thus its syntax) first, because the Delphi syntax is a
2015-07-16 17:23 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com:
Then let me tell you that generic methods will arrive in mode ObjFPC (and
thus its syntax) first, because the Delphi syntax is a PITA to parse/handle.
(in fact generic methods are already working in mode ObjFPC in my local
2015-07-16 22:40 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com:
var
X: strong TDictionaryweak TListInteger, string;
Prefixed modifiers are the /worst/ you can do for Pascal.
it is already being done by introducing specialize keyword.
I have totally different opinion :) for me it is
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 16.07.2015 17:53, Marcos Douglas wrote:
[...]
I didn't understand. This already works... or you talking about work
with the same syntax than Delphi in mode objfpc?
Generic methods are not yet supported by
On 16.07.2015 22:17, Maciej Izak wrote:
2015-07-16 17:23 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com
mailto:pascaldra...@googlemail.com:
Then let me tell you that generic methods will arrive in mode ObjFPC
(and thus its syntax) first, because the Delphi syntax is a PITA to
On 2015-07-16 20:04, Marco van de Voort wrote:
https://xkcd.com/927/
+1
Sadly that is the way the current world works. :)
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:34 PM, silvioprog silviop...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
... // a type, for example (mistakes happen, we are human =D )
I meant a typo, for example. ^^'
--
Silvio Clécio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
___
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On 16.07.2015 22:17, Maciej Izak wrote:
2015-07-16 17:23 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com
mailto:pascaldra...@googlemail.com:
Then let me tell you that generic methods will arrive in mode
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Maciej Izak wrote:
2015-07-16 17:23 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com:
Then let me tell you that generic methods will arrive in mode
ObjFPC (and thus its syntax)
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:34 PM, silvioprog silviop...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] ... allowing us to do core more fast ...
I meant allowing us to do code more fast. =D
--
Silvio Clécio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Maciej Izak wrote:
2015-07-16 17:23 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com:
Then let me tell you that generic methods will arrive in mode ObjFPC (and
thus its syntax) first, because the Delphi syntax is a PITA to parse/handle.
(in fact generic
27 matches
Mail list logo
