In our previous episode, Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis said:
> 2016-04-07 19:07, Graeme Geldenhuys ??:
> > How do I know if a program (executable) is 32-bit or 64-bit under
> > Windows? Using Unix-like OSes, I can simply use the "file"
> > command. What is the equivalent under Windows?
>
Hi Graeme,
Στις 2016-04-07 19:07, Graeme Geldenhuys έγραψε:
How do I know if a program (executable) is 32-bit or 64-bit under
Windows? Using Unix-like OSes, I can simply use the "file"
command. What is the equivalent under Windows?
you can use file ;)
http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/pa
On 2016-04-07 17:11, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> The windows team doesn't think there are sufficient reasons/arguments
> for a 64-bit native compiler.
Lazy buggers! ;-)
> (So, I roll my own. Luckily, this is not that hard)
I'll do the same, thanks.
>> How do I know if a program (executab
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
No my Win64 VM I have FPC 2.6.2 and 2.6.4 installed using the official
FPC installers. For example: fpc-2.6.4.x86_64-win64.exe
I wanted to upgrade my VM to FPC 3.0.0, but I don't seem to find an
official Win64 release like prior versions. All
Hi,
No my Win64 VM I have FPC 2.6.2 and 2.6.4 installed using the official
FPC installers. For example: fpc-2.6.4.x86_64-win64.exe
I wanted to upgrade my VM to FPC 3.0.0, but I don't seem to find an
official Win64 release like prior versions. All I can find as a what I
assume is a 32-bit cross-c
On Thursday 07 April 2016 16:20:16 Santiago A. wrote:
> El 07/04/2016 a las 14:00, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara escribió:
> > I enconter the following pattern frequently (simplified):
> >
> > SQL:
> > Select * From Customers Where FieldX = 1
> >
> > Later i need a similar query that uses a different
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara
wrote:
> Thanks for all the responses
>
> The Marcos' one is particular interesting since goes in a direction a did
> not think earlier
Thanks. I do this for years.
The major advantage, I think, is doesn't need to change the SQL in pie
Thanks for all the responses
The Marcos' one is particular interesting since goes in a direction a did
not think earlier
Luiz
2016-04-07 12:06 GMT-03:00 Graeme Geldenhuys
:
> On 2016-04-07 13:47, Michael Thompson wrote:
> > This moves it up that list...
>
> I can give you many more reason to m
On 2016-04-07 13:47, Michael Thompson wrote:
> This moves it up that list...
I can give you many more reason to move it up even further. ;-) tiOPF is
a treasure trove of goodies (for DB and non-DB projects).
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpc-pascal maillis
El 07/04/2016 a las 14:00, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara escribió:
> I enconter the following pattern frequently (simplified):
>
> SQL:
> Select * From Customers Where FieldX = 1
>
> Later i need a similar query that uses a different filter like
>
> Select * From Customers Where FieldX = 1 and FieldY
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara
wrote:
>
> I enconter the following pattern frequently (simplified):
>
> SQL:
> Select * From Customers Where FieldX = 1
>
> Later i need a similar query that uses a different filter like
>
> Select * From Customers Where FieldX = 1 and F
On 7 April 2016 at 20:20, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> On 2016-04-07 13:00, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
> > If there's not in pascal, someone knows such templating in another
> > languages? The hard part is getting a flexible and functional syntax
>
> I have written such code for the tiOPF p
On 7 April 2016 at 20:06, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <
luizameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any chance sharing the code or at least the syntax?
(I realise I'm hijacking your conversation with Michael - apologies for
that, but this interests me)
My code to initialise the grid (which hides all _ID col
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Are there pros or cons to either?
The fashion of the day. Apparently, programmers are (supposed to be) not intelligent enough to work
with pointers themselves -- if needed. So the compiler does that for you and declares everything a
pointer automatically. Same with "
On 7 April 2016 at 20:00, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <
luizameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any code that given a SQL Template would generate the second
filter when paramy is available and keep blank when not available?
Nope, or at least I don't think so. I've spent a long time looking as
w
On 2016-04-07 13:00, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
> If there's not in pascal, someone knows such templating in another
> languages? The hard part is getting a flexible and functional syntax
I have written such code for the tiOPF project, but it should be quick
to detach any tiOPF dependencie
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
2016-04-07 9:03 GMT-03:00 Michael Van Canneyt :
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Is there any code that given a SQL Template would generate the second
filter when paramy is available and keep blank when not ava
2016-04-07 9:03 GMT-03:00 Michael Van Canneyt :
>
>
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
>
>
>> Is there any code that given a SQL Template would generate the second
>> filter when paramy is available and keep blank when not available?
>>
>>
>>
> I have not found such code. I r
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
I enconter the following pattern frequently (simplified):
SQL:
Select * From Customers Where FieldX = 1
Later i need a similar query that uses a different filter like
Select * From Customers Where FieldX = 1 and FieldY = :paramy
Is the
I enconter the following pattern frequently (simplified):
SQL:
Select * From Customers Where FieldX = 1
Later i need a similar query that uses a different filter like
Select * From Customers Where FieldX = 1 and FieldY = :paramy
Is there any code that given a SQL Template would generate the sec
El 07/04/2016 a las 13:04, Graeme Geldenhuys escribió:
> On 2016-04-07 11:58, Santiago A. wrote:
>> Moreover, if the object uses classes instances that must be freed, you
>> also must call destructor, then any advantage is over.
> Technically yes, but as a rule of thumb, I *never* use Class objects
On 2016-04-07 11:58, Santiago A. wrote:
> Moreover, if the object uses classes instances that must be freed, you
> also must call destructor, then any advantage is over.
Technically yes, but as a rule of thumb, I *never* use Class objects
inside an Object object. That just seems messy.
Regards,
El 06/04/2016 a las 13:23, Graeme Geldenhuys escribió:
> "The difference between objects and classes is mainly that an object is
> allocated on the stack, as an ordinary record would be, and that classes
> are always allocated on the heap."
>
> Are there pros or cons to either?
>
> Regards,
> - G
23 matches
Mail list logo
