Re: [fpc-pascal] Class field property access

> On Jun 7, 2019, at 8:08 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal > wrote: > > Only because this example appears safe does not mean that the whole concept > is safe. > A class might initialize b only later on and with a direct property you'll > only get an access violation. So you'll need a getter

Re: [fpc-pascal] http://wiki.freepascal.org/ web site is totally blank

On 6/7/19 11:05 AM, Dennis wrote: DaWorm wrote: There was a thread yesterday about issues with the servers.  This may be related. The web site is still blank. it'll continue to be ""blank"" until they get everything moved to a new server, too... -- NOTE: No off-list assistance is

Re: [fpc-pascal] http://wiki.freepascal.org/ web site is totally blank

DaWorm wrote: There was a thread yesterday about issues with the servers.  This may be related. Jeff On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 4:58 AM Dennis > wrote: Does it only happen to me? The web site is still blank. Dennis

Re: [fpc-pascal] Class field property access

Ryan Joseph schrieb am Fr., 7. Juni 2019, 14:00: > > > > On Jun 7, 2019, at 2:51 AM, Michael Van Canneyt > wrote: > > > > What kind of behaviour are you referring to. > > Something wrong with my mail server causing your server to block me (Jonas > said my server didn’t handle greylisting

Re: [fpc-pascal] Class field property access

> On Jun 7, 2019, at 2:51 AM, Michael Van Canneyt > wrote: > > What kind of behaviour are you referring to. Something wrong with my mail server causing your server to block me (Jonas said my server didn’t handle greylisting correctly). Easier to just re-sub using gmail for now. > >> Who

Re: [fpc-pascal] Class field property access

Michael Van Canneyt schrieb am Fr., 7. Juni 2019, 08:52: > > This appears to be a regression since 3.0.4 also. Did you specifically > > disable this in 3.3.1? Sorry I’m not understanding this one. > > If it was allowed in previous versions, this was by accident allowed during > parsing and

Re: [fpc-pascal] Class field property access

On Thu, 6 Jun 2019, Ryan Joseph wrote: On Jun 3, 2019, at 11:13 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote: The b field could be Nil and the class might not provide any functionality to check for that. In addition to that it's an additional indirection while records/objects merely require an

Re: [fpc-pascal] Class field property access

> On Jun 3, 2019, at 11:13 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal > wrote: > > The b field could be Nil and the class might not provide any functionality to > check for that. In addition to that it's an additional indirection while > records/objects merely require an offset. > { I’ve resubscribed