> The check for the flag worked.
Yes and many thanks for your clear demo program tmethodinfo.
This removed all my doubts.
> t's the remainder of the code that's broken.
Yes and I did not find how to fix it in the main loop (and I am tired for
this now).
All the tests I did checking flag after
It seems that you can just remove
{$LINKLIB c} in libusb.pas.
The libusb from libusb.info cannot be
used because the functions it provides are different, and if you
try to recompile a version before 1.0 like 0.9.4, it fails because
Windows
fredvs schrieb am Fr., 2. Aug. 2019, 18:32:
> > cause the type information is read only.
>
> Yes, it is why I will not jump into that proposition.
>
> > And if someone is not able to check for a simple flag then they shouldn't
> > work with the RTTI.
>
> Huh, like in your code-fix?
>
> ;-)
>
>
> cause the type information is read only.
Yes, it is why I will not jump into that proposition.
> And if someone is not able to check for a simple flag then they shouldn't
> work with the RTTI.
Huh, like in your code-fix?
;-)
Ok, all is ok, many thanks Sven and have a perfect summer.
Fre;D
fredvs schrieb am Fr., 2. Aug. 2019, 15:11:
> Hello Sven.
>
> > {$if declared(AlignTParamFlags)}
> Excellent!
>
> If, by chance, you're running out of ideas for new methods for fpc 3.3.1
> trunk and have nothing to do or you're bored...
> For people that are not fan of headaches (so not for me),
Here are a few links about msvcrt:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/154753/description-of-the-default-c-and-c-libraries-that-a-program-will-link
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-runtime-library/crt-library-features?view=vs-2019
Hello Sven.
> {$if declared(AlignTParamFlags)}
Excellent!
If, by chance, you're running out of ideas for new methods for fpc 3.3.1
trunk and have nothing to do or you're bored...
For people that are not fan of headaches (so not for me), add this method:
RemovepfHiddeninTParamFlags(Pparamlist).
@Johann: Is the Readme.rst at https://github.com/hansiglaser/pas-libusb
up to date ?
It states that only the legacy version 0.1 of libusb is supported, but
the binary package for Windows on libusb.info is in version 1.0.22.
You can get source code for old versions of libusb on github but it
fredvs schrieb am Fr., 2. Aug. 2019, 13:27:
> > No, It's > 030300, but your version of trunk is too old, the function
> > was only added a few days ago.
>
> Ha, ok. (but a few tricky, a new number for a new feature would be ok too).
>
By definition only the latest version of trunk is considered
> No, It's > 030300, but your version of trunk is too old, the function
> was only added a few days ago.
Ha, ok. (but a few tricky, a new number for a new feature would be ok too).
Thanks Sven.
Fre;D
-
Many thanks ;-)
--
Sent from: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/
10 matches
Mail list logo
