> On Nov 24, 2019, at 3:57 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> What you're looking for is the Count property. Setting it is supported by the
> untyped lists in Classes, the generic ones in FGL as well as those in
> Generics.Collections.
>
> === code begin ===
>
> list :=
Is there a reason that objects don't support variant sections like with
records? Maybe they mess with the VMT table when virtual methods are added?
I just posted my "advanced objects" patch
(https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=36350) and all it does is add "class
operators" to objects but
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
Am 24.11.2019 um 10:14 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
Am 23.11.2019 um 23:42 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal:
I need a pre-grown list which I can put (not insert!) items into at
Am 24.11.2019 um 10:14 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
Am 23.11.2019 um 23:42 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal:
I need a pre-grown list which I can put (not insert!) items into at
indexes
without getting "List index out of bounds"
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
Am 23.11.2019 um 23:42 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal:
I need a pre-grown list which I can put (not insert!) items into at indexes
without getting "List index out of bounds" errors. For example I want to
start with a list that has 10
Am 23.11.2019 um 23:42 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal:
I need a pre-grown list which I can put (not insert!) items into at indexes without
getting "List index out of bounds" errors. For example I want to start with a
list that has 10 empty indexes:
list := TList.Create(10); // 10 empty
