On Sat, 11 Apr 2020, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Apr 11, 2020, at 1:17 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
My guess is you have a config file lying around that causes this to look
different (-Fr option?), or you have a custom-made errore.msg file built-in.
Interesting, so I overrode
> On Apr 11, 2020, at 1:17 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
> wrote:
>
> My guess is you have a config file lying around that causes this to look
> different (-Fr option?), or you have a custom-made errore.msg file built-in.
Interesting, so I overrode the default format in the trunk somehow. I can't
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, fredvs via fpc-pascal wrote:
Does fpc accept relative path for -Fu in the fpc.cfg config file, something
like:
-Fu./units/$fpctarget
-Fu./units/$fpctarget/*
-Fu./units/$fpctarget/rtl
No, it seems that it is not possible.
So I propose to do this, dont hurt existing c
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, fredvs via fpc-pascal wrote:
Hello.
According:
https://wiki.freepascal.org/Configuration_file
Under a Unix or Unix-like operating systems (e.g. FreeBSD, Linux)
1)The current directory.
2)Your home directory, it looks for .fpc.cfg.
3)The directory specified i
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote:
Sorry to ask this yet again but I keep forgetting or remembering wrong. I
thought this was a one time error that was fixed but I'm still getting
different error formats with the trunk (as of today) vs 3.0.4.
Can anyone please confirm wh
Sorry to ask this yet again but I keep forgetting or remembering wrong. I
thought this was a one time error that was fixed but I'm still getting
different error formats with the trunk (as of today) vs 3.0.4.
Can anyone please confirm which it the correct format I should rely on?
Ryans-MacBook-
> Does fpc accept relative path for -Fu in the fpc.cfg config file, something
> like:
> -Fu./units/$fpctarget
> -Fu./units/$fpctarget/*
> -Fu./units/$fpctarget/rtl
No, it seems that it is not possible.
So I propose to do this, dont hurt existing code, only gives happiness:
in cfileutls.pas do
Hello.
The last line of function check_configfile(fn:string; var
foundfn:string):boolean;
should be something like this:
...
else
if CfgFileExists(IncludeTrailingBackslash(ExtractFilePath(ParamStr(0)))+fn)
then
foundfn:=IncludeTrailingBackslash(ExtractFilePath(ParamStr(0)))+fn
else
Hello.
In fpc code /compiler/options.pas, for
function check_configfile(fn:string; var foundfn:string):boolean;
{
Order to read configuration file :
try reading fpc.cfg in :
1 - current dir
2 - configpath
3 - compiler path
}
But if you check in code, the option 3 is nev
Hello.
According:
https://wiki.freepascal.org/Configuration_file
Under a Unix or Unix-like operating systems (e.g. FreeBSD, Linux)
1)The current directory.
2)Your home directory, it looks for .fpc.cfg.
3)The directory specified in the environment variable PPC_CONFIG_PATH,
and if it
> But you need it to compile and link it (especially in C/C++).
Yes, for C/C++ sometimes developers needs the .a static libraries, the new
library.h header, .la files, etc.
And by convenience some libraries give a "dev" packages with all that,
included the "nude" symlink that point to the develop
Luca Olivetti schrieb am Fr., 10. Apr. 2020, 16:11:
> El 10/4/20 a les 14:30, Michael Van Canneyt ha escrit:
>
> > We don't need to use this mechanism ourselves (I've never needed it),
>
> Probably because you already have the needed dev package installed or
> created the symlink yourself.
> No o
El 10/4/20 a les 14:30, Michael Van Canneyt ha escrit:
We don't need to use this mechanism ourselves (I've never needed it),
Probably because you already have the needed dev package installed or
created the symlink yourself.
No other linux binary packaged by any distribution needs the dev
pa
@Michael: Thanks.
<3
Fre;D
--
Sent from: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, fredvs via fpc-pascal wrote:
I'm surprised you want to distribute your own version of the compiler.
Huh, https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=32367
No answer, no no good will, hate, dont want to understand, ... --->
conclusion:
https://github.com/fredvs/freepascal
> I'm surprised you want to distribute your own version of the compiler.
Huh, https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=32367
No answer, no no good will, hate, dont want to understand, ... --->
conclusion:
https://github.com/fredvs/freepascal
Fre;D
--
Sent from: http://free-pascal-general
16 matches
Mail list logo
