Hi,
I think this sounds more like "edit distance", but I am not sure why it would
be needed for a config file.
Thank you,
Noah silva
On 2012/04/12, at 4:12, Juha Manninen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
> wrote:
> I know that there are algorithms which given
Hi leledumbo,
I also tend to Think it's something like that with non-scoped records or
something similar. (this is mostly non-oop code, but there are record types
with members called "tile" in other units that get pulled in...)
However the compiler specifically names other units as the culprit
Sven,
It's not used as a unit name, but there might be "something" "somewhere"
hiding, so I am not ready to file a bug report on it yet.
It's probably better to make another demo program with less cruft.
-- Noah
On 2012/03/01, at 16:13, Sven Barth wrote:
>
Sven,
No, I used it only in TW var section of various methods as a temporary
structure. I should note that this compiled in FPC 2.4 fine.
(that said, the source code in question is quite messy...)
-- Noah
On 2012/03/01, at 16:17, Sven Barth wrote:
> Am 01.03.2012 03:35, schrieb Noah Silva:
alized the conflicting definition Was coming from one of the standard units).
Thank you,
Noah Silva
On 2012/02/29, at 22:27, Sven Barth wrote:
> Am 29.02.2012 14:02, schrieb Noa Shiruba:
>> Also, did anyone else notice that "tile" is now used by some standard units
>>
Hi,
By the way, I was wrong about saying ABAP doesn't work outside of SAP BASIS in
me previous example, I found their research project "caffeine" today and got it
working. Of course my next step will be to see how to make it interface with
FPC. :)
Also, did anyone else notice that "tile" is
Sven,
Wow, you should buy him a book on Delphi. I would say on FPC, but the main FPC
book is only to be had by mail order - I keep hoping they will offer it in
Kindle format or such.
-- Noah
On 2012/02/28, at 18:05, Sven Barth wrote:
> Am 28.02.2012 08:22, schrieb Noah Silva:
>> Well Obj
Hi,
On 2012/02/27, at 23:14, Frank Church wrote:
>
>
> On 27 February 2012 10:15, Frank Church wrote:
> What is the most widely used Pascal on Linux and other Unix variants?
>
> Is it Free Pascal?
>
> --
> Frank Church
>
>
> What license are FPC and Lazarus, are they GPL?
>
The compile
Hi Frank,
On 2012/02/27, at 19:15, Frank Church wrote:
> What is the most widely used Pascal on Linux and other Unix variants?
>
> Is it Free Pascal?
Well I don't have any data to back this up, but I would certainly say FPC.
There is gnu pascal, but it fails to compile even trivial turbo pasc
Hi,
> You can get similar problems when copying code from Windows to OS X,
> because OS X is not only case insensitive, it normalizes UTF
> characters.
Well that's a good thing in the long run, because you can guarantee more
matches if you always normalize.
>
>
> My recommendation: If you have
10 matches
Mail list logo
