Maybe this can be used for debug/release.
I don't see how this can be used for the widgetsets.
Why not ? you can use
subtarget=gtk2-debug
How can I pass sub targets to fppkg?
fppkg -c
You can already use this now for cross-compiling. Under Linux you can
test it with:
- Copy ~/.fppkg/conf
.
What is the best/recommended way to solve this with fpmake?
You can't in this way.
So, no debug and release version on one computer?
Not in this way, at least.
Hi,
Peter Vreman reminded me that we had this discussion on core about a year
ago. The solution we came up with was a 'sub
>> > > Is there a tool to create them automatically?
>> >
>> > Not yet. This is planned.
>>
>> Come on. You didn't add the 14 thousand filenames manually, did you?
>
> The unit source names were added from the Makefile.fpc (there is a conversion
> mode)
> but the rest was added manually.
>
> I rea
>
> FP IDE needs to link to libgdb and all of its dependencies in order to have
> debugger support. OTOH, Lazarus interacts to gdb via TProcess. FP IDE
> approach would be faster but also inextensible and less maintainable. When
> there's a problem with the libgdb (i.e. the library is buggy), the w
>> Pass the --gc-sections parameter to the linker (and use object files
>> compiled with -CX).
>>
> OK, I'll try. What about the *.a's?
--gc-sectiosn will not help. FPC does not generate .o files with multiple
sections for linux.
Smartlinking for linux will create libp*.a files instead. You need
jordi wrote:
I get this error when I try to compile the compiler:
sysos.inc(97,3) Fatal: Internal error 200502052
My OS: linux x86_64, any help will be welcome
There is an problem with code generation. Please submit a bug with the
steps how we can reproduce the issue.
Peter
>
> Is there any way so that Write(Ln) doesn't flush the buffer after each call
> (as if it's called to write to a file, I knew it from rtl's file handling
> source), but only when Flush is called? I found some maniac's code that does
> it at assembler level, but of course it's platform dependant (
> Hi,
>
> when using fpcmake to create distribution packages anything in the
> source dir is getting packed into the "zipsourceinstall"-package.
>
> Is it possible to exclude some selected files or directories by naming
> them in the Makefile.fpc?
No. It is one of the reasons why fpmake/fppkg will
>> Because there are easy ways around it (as you mention) and the work to
>> implement and maintain this would probably outweigh the usefulness.
>>
> Yes, it's easy but uncomfortable and needs more typing.
You can use hexstr() to convert the pointer to a hexadeciaml number:
var p: pointer;
begin
Peter Vreman wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:14:34 +0200
Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
I want to read ppu files like the ppudump tool.
ppudump uses the unit compiler/ppu.pp, but ppu.ppu is not
ins
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:14:34 +0200
Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
I want to read ppu files like the ppudump tool.
ppudump uses the unit compiler/ppu.pp, but ppu.ppu is not
installed by default. At least n
I would like to make a generic class, like this :
{$mode objfpc}
generic TMCollection<_T> = class(TObject)
private
FDefaultItem: _T; // line 35
public
constructor Create;
destructor Destroy;override;
[...]
end;
But I have got the following :
commons.pas(35,21) Error: Identifier not fo
> On 02/11/2007, Darius Blaszijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I would like to profile my code on windows. I tried searching the wiki,
>> but without much success on how to do that on windows. Can anyone
>> explain me in a few words how this can be done?
>
> Did you ever find any information. I
> Currently fpc 2.3.1 cannot build lazarus anymore. It fails on lines like
> MyStream.Write(' ',1);
>
> The write method is declared as
>function Write(const Buffer; Count: Longint): Longint
>
> Why isn't passing literal constant to a formal const parameter allowed
> anymore?
1. It is passed b
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
Does GetAppConfigDir(False) work under Windows Vista? I'm using it in
our applications and we don't have a Vista OS yet to test on.
As far as I understand, Vista uses 'C:\Users\...' and Win2000 and
WinXP uses 'C:\Documents and Settings\...'
Does GetAppConfigDir(Fa
That also in Delphi, but it is for me wrong.
In fact that make my program working wrong when send UserName="Admin"
and Password="", it check password as '""' not empty.
The behaviour is compatible with Delphi and will not be changed.
Might as well remove it then, as it seems to me it's pretty
zaher dirkey wrote:
S := AnsiDequotedStr('""', '"');
Return in S the same source string for empty quoted.
That also in Delphi, but it is for me wrong.
In fact that make my program working wrong when send UserName="Admin"
and Password="", it check password as '""' not empty.
The behaviour is
> Hi, all!
>
> Some time I was building LCL using standart command:
> make clean all # for current target cpu,os
> and
> make clean all OS_TARGET=wince CPU_TARGET=arm PP=ppcarm
>
> ... and everything seem working well.
>
> The problem is that I got some special bugs - some components su
> Hello,
>
> I find more and more units and components (for Lazarus) that are using
> the libc unit. I find it really problematic, because it doesn't exists
> for all platforms and architectures, so why not markring the unit as
> obsolete for the next FPC release so other developers will have to
>
>> > I found that the Do_Syscalls are written in assembly and have only
>> > limited number of parameters (up to 6). Is there a way to write it
>> > using array of TSysParam instead of having 7 different functions ?
>>
>> Maybe but it wouldn't make the assembler easier to read :-).
>
> Actually
Fixed in 2.3.1 in r10311.
Thanks a lot for your quick response. Surely it solves the problem with
empty set as the second parameter. But I'm not sure if the other code I
sent later would also be fixed? - apparently that one had incorrect
valuation when tested with official 2.2.0 for Win32 - a
Adam Naumowicz wrote:
Hello again,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Adam Naumowicz wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to know if this is a known issue, or a new bug.
With the following code:
--
program tester;
type SomeType = ( SomeElem );
const ElemSet = [ SomeElem ];
begin
writeln(SomeElem in
Skybuck Flying wrote:
Doesn't make much sense to me at least.
Who still codes in 16 bit or turbo pascal ?
64 KB programs ?
Terrible limitations.
I am glad those days are dead/gone/over.
It was discussed already a couple of years ago to make objfpc the
default compile mode. But it breaks to
None the less very interesting example.
Problem is ofcourse FPC does not support the new Delphi 2007 features.
And the big question is how would you port this code to FPC ?
Please don't make _your_ problem our problem!!!
You knew beforehand that FPC doesn't support these features. If you want
>
> On 06 Feb 2008, at 23:19, Jonathan Benedicto wrote:
>
>>> From RAD Studio 2007's Help file on Methods
>> (ms-help://borland.bds5/devcommon/methods_xml.html):
>>
>> Like class methods, class static methods can be accessed without an
>> object reference. Unlike ordinary class methods, class stati
> On 30/01/2008, ik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> type
>> TfpgColor = type longword;
>>
>> means that you have a new type in the same *range* of longword. That
>> means that you can assign the same number range, but if you have a
>> variable that is a longword, and you wish to assigned the value
> Michael wrote:
>> 3 ways:
>
> Thanks.. added compiler option info to the fpmake wiki page.
>
>
> Now I'm wondering..when I use "fpmake clean" it doesn't clean any units that
> were compiled
> implicitly.. i.e. units that were not called in with AddUnit, but compiled
> because they were in
> use
> Regarding class constants: I missed them, too, already, although not too
> much. ;)
Maybe you should read the documentation. Static fields are supported already
for 10 years:
~/fpc/compiler>>> cat p.pp
{$mode objfpc}
{$static on}
type
cl=class
l : longint;static;
end;
var
c1,c2 : cl;
> Marco van de Voort wrote:
>>> Marco van de Voort wrote:
> Does FPC support class constants, and if it doesn't, are there any plans
> to add this support?
Have a look at
http://www.freepascal.org/faq.var#extensionselect
The question would be "what would make this possib
>
> I often got the error from FPC "Internal Error 200212277" when I build
> my applications using Lazarus, whatever the version of fpc (<=2.2
> others I don't know)
> It happens only when I choose "build" and not "Build all", so when my
> apps are not entirely rebuild.
>
> What is it exactly ?
> H
> We have a compiled file with debug info (ex: using -gl flag) of 10Mb (about
> 8Mb are Debug).
>
> Currently you use:
>
> objcopy --only-keep-debug $EXE $DBG (read from disk 10Mb from $EXE and
> write 8Mb for create $DBG)
> objcopy --add-gnu-debuglink=$DBG $EXE (read from disk 10Mb from $E
> Ok Peter,
> I'm waiting for your news.
Finished, see r9813
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> is someone working on the -Xg lineinfo/lnfodwrf support, so that using
>> a separate .dbg file for the debug, the software is able to show the
>> call-stack with source line?
Please stop working on this. I have it already working.
Peter
__
> Hi to all,
>
> is someone working on the -Xg lineinfo/lnfodwrf support, so that using
> a separate .dbg file for the debug, the software is able to show the
> call-stack with source line?
Make sure you use the latest svn code. There are already a lot of things
refactored regarding the
reading t
If you request for features please come up with something realistic and also
provide good
information how it then should work. E.g. provide grammar how the syntax and
semantics work. And
if it is for compatibility you should also be able to provide real pascal
examples that show how
ambigious co
>>> The problem with this mechanism is that if you have another
>>> warning which occurs first,
>>> that will stop your compilation, you'll never get to the abstract
>>> warning...
>>
>> I agree.
>> May be a new option in a future release of fpc ? :)
>> It would be nice to have a switch to do it.
>
>> >It is allowed to create such instances: as long as you don't call any of the
>> >abstract methods, there will be no problem.
>>
>>
>> Is there a way to abort the compilation in this cases instead of a warning ?
>
> Currently not.
You can abort compilation in case of any warning with the -Sew o
> Hi,
>
> I am struggling to compile the following code. FPC throws a syntax error
> where the expression is
> IMHO correct.
> Can somebody point me in the right direction?
>
> FPC SVN (rev. 9495) -- FPC 2.2.0 dies with EAccessViolation while compiling
> the code in question
> linux 2.6.23 x86
>
>> >> I submitted this regex-dna program on 2007-10-31. It's still in limbo:
>> >> neither accepted nor rejected.
>> >
>> > Thanks, I've added it to the fpc repository so the source will not be
>> lost
>>
>> For me the code didn't finish in a reasonable time. It spend too much time
>> in moving an
>>
>> --- Marco van de Voort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all
>>> >
>>> > The reason is that D's mean degraded from 1.40 to 1.43. I wonder how
>>> > that could happen.
>>>
>>> They change often. Clean is also quite variable.
>
> --- Marco van de Voort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all
>> >
>> > The reason is that D's mean degraded from 1.40 to 1.43. I wonder how
>> > that could happen.
>>
>> They change often. Clean is also quite variable. I assume
> On 11/1/07, Marc Santhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2007, 00:45 +0200 schrieb ik:
>> > Hi List,
>> >
>> > I have a weird problem. the "fpWrite" is too "slow" for FPC code. When
>> > I have the same exact code in C that writes a big amount of buffers of
>> > the same s
> Hi all,
> I have downloaded the freepascal 2.2.0 fpc source code (
> fpcbuild-2.2.0.zip) and attempted to create a arm-linux cross-compiler that
> runs under win32. I have done this previously with the fpcbuild-2.0.4 .zip
> file ok using this batch file:
>
> **START OF BATCH FILE
> Compelling FPC 2.1.4 to behave like FPC 2.0.4 is not very difficult.
> In a program where you have "A := B - C;" (A,B,C being Longwords), it
> is sufficient to write "A := Longword(Longint(B) - Longint(C));" and all
> is right. The most difficult is to find which lines of code has to be
> modifie
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> >> 1) why is the colon converted to a slash which yields invalid paths (at
>> >> least
>> >> on windows)
>> >> 2) although fpmake initially was developed to be a make tool for FPC, it
>> >> can
>> >> (and will be) used for other projects. The
>> I also think so; I don't think the copy/symlink is necessary; The binary
>> should
>> simply be outputted in the bin/os-cpu directory.
>>
>> fpmake can write a message like 'Writing binary to bin/os-cpu directory' so
>> the user knows where to look.
> Here's a patch that implements all of the a
>>> I was doing some tests with fpmake and came across what appears to be an
>>> inconsistency.
>>>
>>> When fpmaking a program a units/cpu-os is created but the commandline
>>> parameters for FPC are "-FE." which causes the tool and possible other
>>> units to be placed in the directory where the
> I was doing some tests with fpmake and came across what appears to be an
> inconsistency.
>
> When fpmaking a program a units/cpu-os is created but the commandline
> parameters for FPC are "-FE." which causes the tool and possible other
> units to be placed in the directory where the program is l
At 18:37 11-8-2007, you wrote:
Peter Vreman wrote:
I got the following error message:
Unknown name/value pair in compiler section : unittargetdir
Unknown name/value pair in clean section : files
Which is:
unittargetdir=./units/$(CPU_TARGET)-$(OS_TARGET)
files=$(wildcard ./units/$(CPU_TARGET
At 17:15 11-8-2007, you wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
fppkg mkconvert
Should be "fppkg convertmk" ;)
It will convert the Makefile.fpc in the current directory and
compiles and runs it. I just tested here, and it works fine.
Right, much better indeed :) But
I got the following erro
>> The idea is that you do a
>>
>> fppkg
>>
>> this will look in a database for the package, extract it,
>> and the compile fpmake.pp and run it. The fpmake contains
>> all configuration to make and zip the package.
>>
> Aha, this clears up some mist in my mind. But I still don't really
> understa
> Hi again,
>
> how can the name of the files created by the targets "zipinstall" and
> "zipsourceinstall" be influenced?
>
> I've tried this way:
>
>
> [prerules]
> pretest:
> echo $(ZIPNAME)
> echo $(ZIP_ZIPNAME)
>
> [target]
> programs=cnfdat2h5
>
> [package]
> name=cnfdat2h5
> vers
At 22:03 1-8-2007, you wrote:
Hi,
when using Makefiles something like this is executed at runtime, so a
variable can be set by a command:
PWD=`pwd`
or
PDW=$(pwd)
sets the Varaible $PWD to the current path.
If one of both forms is used in a fpcmake-file that doesn't work.
>
> On 21 jun 2007, at 16:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I committed it in trunk in r7756.
>>
>> I created a wiki page with missing changes in the fixes branch. I
>> am considering to add them the snapshots built for Lazarus.
>> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/
>> Useful_changes_not_in_the_fi
At 19:58 2-6-2007, you wrote:
Hello,
1.
var s:string;
...
s[1]:='#'; --> causes an access violation
2.
Why is it no more possible to assign the length index s[0] in a string?
I find that is too much security to supress that.
It is cutting responsibility from the programmers.
You are usi
At 22:53 17-5-2007, you wrote:
Hello,
What are the FPC defines for it's versions? I would like to separate
some code from FPC 2.0.4 and FPC 2.2 (actually development 2.1) due to
some bugs in 2.0.4 that were corrected on 2.1
{$ifdef VER2_0}
2.0.x code
{$else}
2.1+ code
{$endif}
Peter
___
> Vincent Snijders schreef:
>> Hi,
>>
>> If I compile a unit which contains {$R wincemenures.res} a file named
>> wincemenures.or is created in the source directory, even if I have set
>> -FU or -FE. What parameter do I need to pass to the compile to move the
>> .or file to the unit output director
.
make[6]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/freepascal/svn/fpc_26_04_2007/packages/fcl-db/src/dbase'
make -C src/sqlite all
make[6]: Entering directory
`/tmp/freepascal/svn/fpc_26_04_2007/packages/fcl-db/src/sqlite'
make[6]: No se hace nada para `all'.
make[6]: Leaving directory
>
> I'm making SVN (v2.3.
> On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 08:07 +0100, Peter Vreman wrote:
>> > <..>
>> > fpcmake -p -Tarm-linux Makefile.fpc
>> > Processing Makefile.fpc
>> > Error: Target "linux", package "fcl-base" not found
>> > make[7]: *** [fpc
> <..>
> fpcmake -p -Tarm-linux Makefile.fpc
> Processing Makefile.fpc
> Error: Target "linux", package "fcl-base" not found
> make[7]: *** [fpc_install] Error 1
> make[7]: Leaving directory `/home/tmk/fpc/fixes_2_2/packages/fcl-db'
> make[6]: *** [fcl-db_install] Error 2
You need to update fp
Hello again :), I just forgot to ask; Delphi has an option to
generate a so called "map file" that contains the function
addresses matched with the function names when an executable
compiled. What would be the equivalent FPC functionality for this?
man ld -> search for "map" -> there is a "--p
At 23:39 5-2-2007, you wrote:
I think that its great that the hornet's nest that I stirred up might
mean that a new unit of container classes gets written...
...My trouble remains...
Getting a better containers unit is nice, but the root of the
problem seems to be the memory manager. Delphi's
At 13:45 27-1-2007, you wrote:
Op Fri, 26 Jan 2007, schreef Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
> On 1/26/07, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For Windows there is even an internal linker. If symbian uses something
> > like PE coff you can maybe
> > even use
> On 1/26/07, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> COFF is something like TIFF or AVI. Usually linkers and assembler don't make
>> use
>> of everythin one format supports. Best bet is to dump some object files of
>> CodeWarrior and try to adapt the FPC coff backend so it is also able to
At 21:57 3-11-2006, you wrote:
> > If you want a 'stable' trunk stick with r5191 for now.
>
> .. but don't use smart-linking (-XX) then.
>
> better use r5180 ..
ok, i havend belived this but seems to be an compiler issue maybe the ppu
check code is broken in revisions >5191 or something else
wit
At 17:33 3-11-2006, you wrote:
yes but there are some lovely stuff on the trunk ;)
like working debug symbols with the internal linker and so on
If you want a 'stable' trunk stick with r5191 for now.
Peter
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lis
At 21:47 1-11-2006, you wrote:
2006/11/1, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 21:23 1-11-2006, you wrote:
>I all,
>
>when using -Xe option DBG is working, but when using -Xi it is not. Is
>it normal? (Using an old 3823 revision.)
It works with current SVN.
Ok, I see; I
At 21:43 1-11-2006, you wrote:
2006/11/1, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexandre Leclerc schrieb:
>
> For now, the only thing I'm sure about is that with version 2.0.4 of
> the compiler it is working correctly with ROPS for this problem.
>
Can't you try the binary search to find the re
At 21:23 1-11-2006, you wrote:
I all,
when using -Xe option DBG is working, but when using -Xi it is not. Is
it normal? (Using an old 3823 revision.)
It works with current SVN.
Peter
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
ht
At 21:59 31-10-2006, you wrote:
2006/10/31, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler
>in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using
>revisi
At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler
in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using
revision 3823 I have no problems.
The parameters in the script when passed to actual FPC code is not
working well..
> Hi all, it's been a long time.. but I have a question.
>
> Is there any way tell FPCMAKE to rename all PROGRAMS to have a different
> extension?
>
> Example:
>
> On Windows:
> someprog.exe --> someprog.abc
>
> On Linux/BSD
> someprog --> someprog.abc
>
> Or is there any predefined mac
>> I have noticed that too..
>>
>> I changed the order in about 60 files in my project... :)
>>
>> It would be nice if {$mode objfpc} makes {$H+} automatic...
>
> It has been considered once, but I can't remember why it was
> not put in effect, there was some reason, but I don't recall why :(
Brea
At 18:49 25-10-2006, you wrote:
But, what about resourcestrings?
They will not be placed in the .rsrc section. They are handled
differently (gettext compatible) in FPC for cross-platform reasons.
Peter
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists
At 16:00 27-9-2006, you wrote:
Hi,
Is TFPHashTable the same as Delphi's THashedStringList?
I am looking for a List class that can hold large amounts of objects
with a ID string associated for quick lookups.
For the compiler i created a TFPHashList and TFPHashObjectList as
similair to TFPList
>> > Does this mean we can't do snapshot on win32? Is there a fix planned?
>> Eg
>> > couldn't we write a fpc version of cp - guess this would only be a few
>> > lines or is it more complicated than this?
>> This situation is there already for years.
>
> If I get it right, one is supposed to have C
> Does this mean we can't do snapshot on win32? Is there a fix planned? Eg
> couldn't we write a fpc version of cp - guess this would only be a few
> lines or is it more complicated than this?
This situation is there already for years.
___
fpc-pascal ma
> Greetings.
>
> When running 'make zipinstall' under Win32, the process ends with the
> following error:
> cp.exe: cannot remove old link to
> `D:/fpc/../fpc-pack/examples/oracle/.svn/text-
>
> base/Makefile.fpc.svn-base': Permission denied
This is a know issue. It is a bug in the non-fpc cp.exe
> >> > I can't figure out how to get source code filename & line numbers in
> >> > Valgrind output. What is the correct flags association ?
> >> >
> >> > I tried -gv, -gv -g, -gv -gw, -gv -gl,...
> >> >
> >> > I'm using Valgrind 3.2.0 in Debian Etch GNU/linux for x86_64, Fpc
> >>
> >> 2.4.0
> >>
> Le Jeudi 7 Septembre 2006 20:42, Peter Vreman a écrit :
>> > I can't figure out how to get source code filename & line numbers in
>> > Valgrind output. What is the correct flags association ?
>> >
>> > I tried -gv, -gv -g, -gv -gw, -gv -gl,...
&
> I can't figure out how to get source code filename & line numbers in
> Valgrind output. What is the correct flags association ?
>
> I tried -gv, -gv -g, -gv -gw, -gv -gl,...
>
> I'm using Valgrind 3.2.0 in Debian Etch GNU/linux for x86_64, Fpc 2.4.0
valgrind for x86_64 is not tested yet with fpc
At 19:04 4-9-2006, you wrote:
Ok. Do you know a way to allocate a new PString?. In Delphi NewStr does it.
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/sysutils/newstr.html
Peter
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.fr
At 14:41 4-9-2006, you wrote:
I found that the documentation of the rtl (objects unit) contains a
small error in the Synopsis of
the NewStr function.
It says:
"Synopsis: Allocate a copy of a SHORTSTRING on the heap."
I think you should replace the word SHORTSTRING by STRING.
No, shortstrin
> Is the following allowed in a Makefile.fpc
>
> [target]
> units=unit1 unit2 unit3
> dirs_linux=x11
> dirs_freebsd=x11
> dirs_win32=win32
>
> I have read the docs and know the "dirs" is a valid setting in the
> "target" section. But I have seen somewhere an example where they
> included the plat
> Hi,
>
> Can anybody please explain to me FPC packages? I don't understand
> them. I read as much as I could from the docs, but still not sure.
>
> What I understand from packages, is a set of units that work together.
> They don't need to be part of the FPC distribution though.
Correct
>
> S
>> I'm still working on other things but that leaves me wondering whether
>> there's
>> scope for the main part of fp and the gdb interface to attempt to use
>> incompatible library versions at runtime. On the machine (Debian
>> "Sarge") I'm
>> using for the build /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.3.2.so, o
> Hello,
>
> in fpc you have to tell the compiler which registers are used in asm code.
>
> for example
>
> asm
>mov ax,123
> end [eax];
>
> Is it possible to make a compilerswitch that the compiler tells that there
> is
> every register used in asm code? In this case it woult be possible
What's the alternative?
To have most of internal procedures public with a comment "for internal
use only", I really don't like it, or to have all code in a single file,
I don't like it too.
What about "friend units'?
Or something like as it is "solved" in delphi with helper classes (p215).
(Ma
>> I think this has being supported for a long time now. At least FPC
>> 2.0.2 can build libraries without any problems.
> I tried that with FPC 2.0.2 too, and it worked fine for win32 and
> linux-i386 (32 bits), but not for linux-x86_64, there was a problem with
> generating PIC (Position Independ
on't bother with Solaris in 2.0.x, it won't work at all. None of
the Solaris fixes from 2.1.1 have been merged
On a positive note, Sparc/Solaris works fine in 2.1.1
I tried to merge it in the past but aborted it. The Solaris RTL
changes had a too much conflicts to qualify for a merge to 2
> Vincent Snijders wrote:
>
>> Look up the syscall_nr_exit_group (the number for exit_group syscall)
>> for sparc and
>> add it to rtl/linux/sparc/sysnr.inc and try to compile again.
>>
>> This syscall was not used in fpc 2.0.2, but was added afterwards. You
>> might find
>> more of those.
>
> Than
> Tomas Hajny wrote:
>
>> I propose to check with the 2.0.4-rc2 sources. You can get these from
>> ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/2.0.4-rc2/source/,
>
> That builds (make cycle) OK on/for linux-i386 using FPC 2.0.2, but on
> linux-sparc using FPC 2.0.0 I get:
>
> Target OS: Linux for SPARC
>
At 17:06 31-7-2006, you wrote:
First, is this the best list to discuss this?
I've got rather agressive filtering in my mailing list gateway. If
anybody tries
to send any attachments etc. to me please use markMLl.fpc2 .AT.
telemetry .DOT.
co .DOT. uk.
I admit readily to being a beginner as f
At 14:35 31-7-2006, you wrote:
Hello!
You (Peter Vreman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
about "Re: Windows 64 bit [fpc-pascal]" on 07/31/2006 at 15:05:
PV> make CPU_TARGET=x86_64 OS_TARGET=win64 build install
PREFIX=
Thank you for the tip.
When I use those settings, I get the 6
At 14:17 31-7-2006, you wrote:
Hello!
You (Peter Vreman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
about "Re: [fpc-pascal] Minor issue compiling FPC from sources" on
07/31/2006 at 15:02:
PV> gecho.exe is delivered FPC.
PV> Make sure you only use the make.exe and the tools delivered w
At 13:17 31-7-2006, you wrote:
Hello!
You (Florian Klaempfl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote about "Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows 64 bit" on 07/27/2006 at 10:17:
>> I downloaded 64-bit toolset in April (afair). Is there any new version
>> available?
FK> No, but building them from source is no problem
At 12:12 31-7-2006, you wrote:
Hello!
I tried to compile the daily snapshot from source and got the following
during compilation:
make.EXE[3]: Entering directory `D:/FreePascal/sources/fpc/compiler'
process_begin: CreateProcess((null), echo Start 12:42:49 now 12:43:09, ...)
failed.
make (e=2):
At 22:18 24-7-2006, you wrote:
I'm new to free-pascal, and have searched for a few hours without
finding an answer to my question. I hope someone on the list could
please help point me in the right direction.
I've been using a couple of encryption/decryption units that are
written in Pascal
At 12:30 22-6-2006, you wrote:
Steve Williams wrote:
Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Hi,
When I ty to compile fpc-svn for arm-linux it stops with Internal
error 200203271 when buildgtk2.pp/gtkspinbutton.inc is compiled.
Was there a solution for this? I've just come across this error
now while t
>
> Are const parameters supposed to ensure read only access?
> If so how come one can write to a typed pointer?
>
> program project1;
>
> {$mode objfpc}{$H+}
>
> type
> PSomeRec = ^TSomeRec;
> TSomeRec = record
> a: string;
> b: string;
> end;
>
> procedure ChangeRec1(c
1 - 100 of 377 matches
Mail list logo
