:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=27988
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=27994
It might help you understand if the problem is the same or not.
Regards,
--
Stéphane Aulery
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http
that it is possible that it will be
accepted.
Regards,
--
Stéphane Aulery
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
, then.
The Lazarus error messages are probably a different story.
If the format is unimportant, why is that different please ?
--
Stéphane Aulery
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman
Hello Sven,
Le vendredi 08 mai 2015 à 02:00:06, Sven Barth a écrit :
Am 08.05.2015 11:39 schrieb Stéphane Aulery saul...@free.fr:
With Frédéric Da Vitoria, we began to review the status of the translation
of the FPC. We concluded that it is very difficult to maintain and not
very
useful
is also very problematic.
There is also the translation of fpdoc update. I started watching. There
is a resource compilation problem because the code has changed but the
makefile has not been adapted taking into account the translations.
Regards,
--
Stéphane Aulery
already compiled
before that.
My test system is a fresh XUbuntu, 32-bit. No FPC was installed before
using fpcup.
Can everybody else build FPC on Linux?
I have build fpc directly form trunk Wednesday on Debian testing amd64, all
rights!.
--
Stéphane Aulery
