Re: [fpc-pascal] Program not running

2013-05-29 Thread Thomas Schatzl
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 18:48 +0200, Koenraad Lelong wrote: > Op 29-05-13 18:16, Thomas Schatzl schreef: > > > > There's snapshot on the ftp. > Downloaded ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/v27/arm-linux-armhf/ > > > > >> Should I do this "nativ

Re: [fpc-pascal] Program not running

2013-05-29 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 14:01 +0200, Koenraad Lelong wrote: > Op 27-05-13 21:20, Koenraad Lelong schreef: > > Hi, > > > .. > > A suggestion on the hardkernel-forum said it might be an armhf problem. > Is it prossible to compile fpc from armhf ? There's snapshot on the ftp. > Should I do this

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC x86+x64 win trunk failing to build (using fpcup): 2 different errors

2012-09-21 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 08:42 +0200, Tomas Hajny wrote: > On Thu, September 20, 2012 17:30, Reinier Olislagers wrote: > > On 20-9-2012 17:25, Jonas Maebe wrote: > >> > >> On 20 Sep 2012, at 17:18, Reinier Olislagers wrote: > >> > >>> Would looking into the actual fpmake bug make sense (i.e. is i

Re: [fpc-pascal] Label

2012-08-09 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On 08/ 9/12 05:08 PM, Rainer Stratmann wrote: Just because it sounds that way: is it possible inside the procedure? Yes, if the label declaration is also inside the procedure. You can only take the address of a globally declared label iff a) the label is also defined in the global scope ("b

Re: [fpc-pascal] Inline bytes

2012-08-09 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On 08/ 9/12 03:09 PM, Rainer Stratmann wrote: How is it possible to put some inline bytes in the code like the former inline( $1f , $ef , $1A ); instruction? Not sure if it is the official way, but the following works: with {$asmmode att} asm .byte 0x1f, 0xef, 0x1a end; and with {$asm

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: UnicodeString comparison performance

2012-07-24 Thread Thomas Schatzl
HI, On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 16:58 +0200, OBones wrote: > Jonas Maebe wrote: > > On 23 Jul 2012, at 10:58, OBones wrote: > > > >> leledumbo wrote: > >>> I look at the generated code and in the direct one there's additional > >>> overhead of decrementing the reference counter on each iteration. > >> I

Re: RE : [fpc-pascal] Database problem on Solaris SPARC

2012-07-12 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 09:47 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Ludo Brands wrote: > > Builds OK on SPARC Solaris 10 using 2.6.0, but on running get a > consistent error > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > [Switching to LWP 4] > 0x004b08b8 in TPQCONNECTION__LOADFIELD (CU

Re: RE : RE : [fpc-pascal] Reversing bit-order of byte

2012-05-04 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 14:14 +0200, Koenraad Lelong wrote: > On 03-05-12 13:27, Thomas Schatzl wrote: > ... > > function reverse(b : byte) : byte; assembler; nostackframe; > > asm > >.long 0xe6ff0f30 // rbit r0, r0 > >lsr r0, r0, #23 > > end; >

Re: RE : RE : [fpc-pascal] Reversing bit-order of byte

2012-05-03 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 12:54 +0200, Ludo Brands wrote: > > Thanks all for your replies. > > I already found the RBIT-instruction. I also found out I need > > to study > > the arm assembly language ;-) > > > > But how do I get my variable ? Is that in some register ? Is > > there any > > do

Re: [fpc-pascal] Reversing bit-order of byte

2012-05-03 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 07:55 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Koenraad Lelong wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm porting a driver, originally written in C, for an LCD to be used > > with an embedded arm-processor (STM32). > > The original driver uses SPI, my driver will use a USART in synchronous >

Re: [fpc-pascal] making FPC more code optimized

2012-04-29 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 17:38 +0200, Florian Klämpfl wrote: > Am 29.04.2012 17:34, schrieb Thomas Schatzl: > > Hi > >> florian@ubuntu32:~$ ldd ./test > >> libfprtl-2.7.1.so => > >> /home/florian/./fpc/svn/rtl/units/i386-linux/libfprtl-2.7, >

Re: [fpc-pascal] making FPC more code optimized

2012-04-29 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 15:50 +0200, Florian Klämpfl wrote: > Am 29.04.2012 15:13, schrieb Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior: > > If you deploy one executable, ok, but if you want to create a handfull > > of executables (following unix logic of many small programs) then you > > have a problem. > > Indee

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

2011-12-19 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 13:16 +0200, Juha Manninen wrote: > 2011/11/28 Henry Vermaak > There is an arm release for 2.6.0rc1, but it was built using > old binutils (last time I checked, at least): > > ftp://freepascal.stack.nl/pub/fpc/beta/2.6.0-rc1/arm-linux/ >

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

2011-11-28 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, Am 28.11.2011 15:18, schrieb Henry Vermaak: On 28/11/11 13:41, Juha Manninen wrote: Hi Is FPC 2.2.2 really the latest native release for ARM processors? I guess it can build the more recent versions. (?) There is an arm release for 2.6.0rc1, but it was built using old binutils (last time

Re: [fpc-pascal] Working Free Pascal android JNI example

2011-08-10 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:59:03 +0200, Thomas Schatzl wrote: Hi, On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:09:26 +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: Hello, I am ressuscitating this ancient thread because I'd like to continue the talk about it =) My main doubt here is if androidprt0.as is r

Re: [fpc-pascal] Working Free Pascal android JNI example

2011-08-10 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:09:26 +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: Hello, I am ressuscitating this ancient thread because I'd like to continue the talk about it =) My main doubt here is if androidprt0.as is really required, which would mean that I can only produce android libraries if I

Re: [fpc-pascal] android share library with classes unit

2011-04-13 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:56:39 -0700 (PDT), herux wrote: I managed to compile and run the library for android on emulator, which I compile the project just a libhellojni.so compile using paramater like this ppcarm -Scghi -O1 -Parm -gl -b -B -XX -Xc -XD -CpARMv6 -CfSOFT -dandroid -vewnhi -

Re: [fpc-pascal] Converting 32bit intel asm to Pascal or 64bit at&t asm

2011-03-09 Thread Thomas Schatzl
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 13:23:55 -0500, Andrew Haines wrote: On 03/09/11 12:26, Thomas Schatzl wrote: Hi, On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:58:08 -0500, Andrew Haines wrote: if Tmp <> Im then begin //Tmp := ln(Tmp)*LogBase+Shift; // same as the following asm proc?

Re: [fpc-pascal] Converting 32bit intel asm to Pascal or 64bit at&t asm

2011-03-09 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:58:08 -0500, Andrew Haines wrote: if Tmp <> Im then begin //Tmp := ln(Tmp)*LogBase+Shift; // same as the following asm proc? asm FLD LogBase; FLD Tmp; FYL2X; FYL2X calculates the log to the base 2 of tmp, no

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpc and armv5-android

2011-02-27 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 04:32:14 -0800 (PST), Dejan Boras wrote: > Is there anyone on this list who uses fpc with android under windows and > the android emulator(armv5) without problems(e.g. basic functionality at > least like sysutils, ansistrings, ...)? I'm just trying to figure out if > I'm d

Re: [fpc-pascal] Ansistrings under Android

2011-02-22 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:34:06 -0500, Andrew Haines wrote: > On 02/22/11 12:06, de_jean_ wrote: >> Now that I have a working fpc crosscompiler for Android, and all the >> code runs ok, I encountered another problem. Namely working with >> ansistrings causes crashes. For example, in a simple

Re: [fpc-pascal] Need help fixing leaks

2010-12-21 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:33:51 -0800 (PST), leledumbo wrote: > [...] > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x in ?? () > (gdb) bt > #0 0x in ?? () > #1 0x00406c32 in SYSTEM_TOBJECT_$__FREE () > #2 0x0040d916 in TFPGOBJECTLIST$TLLVMVALUE__DEREF (ITEM=0x55138

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Endian issues when porting FPC programs from x86 to other platforms

2010-11-03 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 23:49:03 +0100, Bo Berglund wrote: > On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 22:53:21 +0100, Vinzent Höfler > wrote: > >>On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:39:31 +0100, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Bo Berglund >>> wrote: Thanks, that helps a lot

Re: [fpc-pascal] Endian issues when porting FPC programs from x86 to other platforms

2010-11-02 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, > Or maybe this is a moot question if FPC is only so far running on > platforms that have the same endian as x86 CPU:s? I have no > information on this though... > > I can see at least these targets: > - Windows and Linux on x86 CPU:s > - Embedded Linux on ARM CPU:s Sparc, PowerPC are big en

Re: [fpc-pascal] ARM-Cortex port

2010-08-24 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:53:55 +0100, Geoffrey Barton wrote: >> >> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:57:30 -0300 >> Thanks Jonas and Jeppe for your answers. I will probably wait then to >> switch (or try to convince the company to use an ARM-9) > > using Jonas and Jeppe's answers to my idiot question

[fpc-pascal] Re: fast sqrt routine

2006-03-22 Thread Thomas Schatzl
>Andrew Bennett >Sat, 11 Mar 2006 17:24:51 -0800 > >On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:44:52 +0100, Pianoman wrote: > >>Hi, I need to perform very fast squareroot (sqrt) operations on double >> type nukmbers. >>I tried this >>function mysqrt(a:double):double; >> [...] >>yn:=(y*y+a)/(2*y); >>until abs(yn-y) <

Re: [fpc-pascal] "is"

2005-04-08 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, Michael Van Canneyt schrieb: On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Thomas Schatzl wrote: Summing MI with interfaces up: - interfaces are only specifications, so there is no clash of implementations - they neither have some initialization, so there's no problem about constructing the instance either -

Re: [fpc-pascal] "is"

2005-04-07 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, Marco van de Voort schrieb: That there are different types of iterators (forward, backward, and random access, readonly, writeable, ...) is definitely a feature of a specific iterator imo. I'm more thinking on different properties. E.g. on address, on name etc. I don't understand that rem

Re: [fpc-pascal] "is"

2005-04-07 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, Thomas Schatzl schrieb: Michael Van Canneyt schrieb: For example; MI for interfaces for me is strange (to say the least) because interfaces were introduced to avoid the mess of MI in the first place. So why on earth would you want to introduce it ?? Since interfaces do not have/inherit

Re: [fpc-pascal] "is"

2005-04-07 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, Marco van de Voort schrieb: you could write: x : TSomeElement; someCollection : TSomeCollection; [...] foreach elem in someCollection do begin << do something with elem >> end; [...] True, BUT... hmm, I actually have 3 BUTS It is some sort of syntactic sugar, so all your but's are va

Re: [fpc-pascal] "is"

2005-04-07 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, Michael Van Canneyt schrieb: For example; MI for interfaces for me is strange (to say the least) because interfaces were introduced to avoid the mess of MI in the first place. So why on earth would you want to introduce it ?? Because MI itself isn't bad, it's often an appropriate representat

Re: [fpc-pascal] "is"

2005-04-05 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, >> >>Probably this also gives some additional opportunities for code >>optimizations. > > Well, I bet people would cry if the iterator works randomly and not > element by element :) Don't know why you're so focused at this point, but certainly, yes, they would =) but as I already mentioned,

Re: [fpc-pascal] "is"

2005-04-05 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, I think I have to make some things more clear why I am in favor of that "foreach": Thomas Schatzl schrieb: Features being developed now are: MI interfaces 90% (MI=multiple inheritance) Inclasses 15% (embedded classes) foreach 0% (well, we know you hate it) It's a usele

Re: [fpc-pascal] "is"

2005-04-05 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, everything below is imho as usual... ;) Florian Klaempfl schrieb: (wow, that's a long "currently", and a lot of 1-2 weeks)? And my best guess is that interfaces are >>not part of the 2.0 plan (even bug reports and fixes I made were >>completely ignored, just like interfaces aren't part of

Re: [fpc-pascal] interface "is" patch (finished and included)

2005-04-01 Thread Thomas Schatzl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Quoting Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, ml wrote: I have downloaded and checked the patch, however I'm not a compiler person. The RTL patch looks OK to me. have you checked what happens with an object passed through COM ? COM? as I already

Re: [fpc-pascal] Question about interfaces and patch

2005-03-26 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, note in advance: if I mention CORBA interfaces, I actually mean "CORBA style" or Java/.net like interfaces (which are not real CORBA interfaces anyway) in the following (too lazy to do a search&replace or find another term). [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: ml schrieb: Hmmm, Delphi gives a compil

Re: [fpc-pascal] Question about interfaces and patch

2005-03-25 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, ml schrieb: I made one wrong statement. It's not "as" that doesn't work. getinterfaceentry works only for interfaces that have guid specified. By default guid is zeroed, and getinterfaceentry just returns first interface in table, which means wrong. Same problem shows in Support too. Hmmm, D

Re: [fpc-pascal] Resources or alike

2005-03-19 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, MichaÅ WoÅniak schrieb: Is it possible in FPC to incorporate something like Delphi resources into the compiled program? What I need is including a binary file within the executable (like when using BRCC32 and *.rc files in Delphi) so that its contents are accessible to the program at runt

Re: [fpc-pascal] TSR Programs

2005-03-09 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, Pianoman schrieb: Hello, how can I create resident programs for WIN32 in FPC? Any help or docs would be appreciated. Pianoman There are no special "resident" programs anymore, simply create a normal GUI app with an invisible window or a service. See below for more info: E.g. Use {$APPTYPE

Re: [fpc-pascal] Questions

2005-01-31 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, Pianoman schrieb: I Have two questions: Is there any windows/DOS port of the numerix library? Since Google reveals lots of libraries called "numerix", it may be helpful for others to be more specific. (I personally don't know any Numerix library, even less ones ported for FPC) 2. How to de

Re: [fpc-pascal]help please

2004-09-26 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, Janos Krizan schrieb: Dear Sirs, It is so complicated. I am not subscribed but I need help anyway in > order to get started. [A copy of this answer is cc'ed to the original From: address] I have dosw321010full.zip version of free Pascal and I can not make > it work. I suspect that it has to

Re: [fpc-pascal]Yet another impossible task

2004-09-03 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, Jérémie LEFRANCOIS schrieb: I would be very happy to solve the following problem, any suggestion is welcome. I work with MS-DOS 6.2, trying to port from TP55 to Freepascal GO32. There is a terminate stay resident program (for which I have no access to the sources) that deals with the interfa

Re: [fpc-pascal]Compiler switches

2004-09-03 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, I'd like to try using JEDI-SDL but the directions only tell how to set up the IDE... not how to use the command line compiler under Linux. I'm stumped on a few of them. I condensed the following from the JEDI-SDL Yahoo Group instructions and added what I think the corresponding command-li

Re: [fpc-pascal]Delphi "9" language features...

2004-08-13 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, Exactly, which is why I prefer the idea Borland has gone for. The STL is not a good idea. The behaviour of the d9 iterators appear to me very unspecific. In which I think this is because the origin of this information is only a blog entry, no specification... order does it iterate throu

Re: [fpc-pascal]Default calling convention

2004-07-02 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, In this case procedure nx_fill(P: PLongword; Count: Longint; Value: Longword); assembler; asm pushl %edi movlP,%edi // edi <- P movlValue,%eax // eax <- Value movlCount,%ecx // ecx <- Count rep stosl

Re: [fpc-pascal]Default calling convention

2004-07-02 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Marcel Martin schrieb: Peter Vreman a écrit : Check what Delphi does for nested procedures. If it is different from FPC then FPC will be adapted. Overall, no :-) Delphi (at least the version 5.01) is bugged. > > [example code snipped] Interestingly, D7 has the same bug. I think the best thing that

Re: [fpc-pascal]Default calling convention

2004-07-02 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, I noticed that, with FPC 1.9.4, the (default) calling convention "register" depends on the fact that a routine is or is not embedded in an other routine. With "proc(A,B,C: Longint);", if "proc" is not embedded then eax = A, edx = B and ecx = C but if "proc" is embedded then edx = A, ecx = B

Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows unit problems

2004-06-09 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, > I'm attempting to retrieve information about the current resolution > settings, but I'm not having much luck. I've downloaded the Borland Win32 > API, but I'm still stuck with creating the device context, and so on. I > need some massive help with this... =( Because the Borland help f

Re: [fpc-pascal]Message methods - DefaultHandler

2004-06-08 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, > I have some problem with DefaultHandler method. When I pass a >message for which is special handler defined everything is ok, but when >it should be passed to DefaultHandler (which is overriden) it does >nothing. Here is some sample code: > > {$MODE OBJFPC} > type TMyMessage = record

Re: [fpc-pascal]Access BIOS from fpc

2004-05-11 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, > Is it possible to access the PC BIOS from FPC? > I want to create a fpc program to read the name and > version of the BIOS > or maybe even change some settings like boot from cdrom > or IDE or PXE using > FPC. The PC has Phoenix bios, is that possible? Depends on the platform you're comp

Farpointers Was: Re: RE: [fpc-pascal]Problem with CASE statement

2004-03-24 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, > Second - new FPC v1.9.x for statement > > var p:pointer > p:=Ptr(a,b); > > shows error "Incompatible types: got "FarPointer" expected "Pointer"". > > I found i can declare var p:farpointer; > but i did not found any description for this type of pointer > how can i use it. It seems that t

Re: [fpc-pascal]high performance counter for dos/tp7

2004-03-22 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, > > But ehm... it seems your website is locked... unable to view/download code > etc :) > > I thought I'd let you know just in case you forgot to unlock it =D No, this is a public website and I checked the URL I gave you, it works fine from my place. Same goes for the links to the sources,

Re: [fpc-pascal]feature request: enhanced "pos"

2004-03-21 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, >>> x := pos ('Hello', my_str, 6); >> >> PosEx() from strutils? > >Cant find it in strutils.. Just checked the sources again, at least the 1.9.x branch contains a PosEx method, line 93ff, from today's sources =) Regards, Thomas ___ fpc-pasca

[fpc-pascal]PasDoc / automatically generating doc skeleton

2004-03-21 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, I'd like to ask if anyone knows a tool which can automatically generate PasDoc documentation headers for existing source code. E.g. adding all tags and probably default dummy values to all method declarations which can to be filled in by the programmer afterwards. Copy&paste has proven to

Re: [fpc-pascal]high performance counter for dos/tp7

2004-03-21 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, > > So a computer calling an interrupt routine a million times (for microsecond > > accuracy) that does not seem like a good idea performance wise. > > > > Also calculating the control word (?) can be inaccurate (?): control_word > > := $1234DD div frequency; ( ??? what about the remainder

Re: [fpc-pascal]exception handling

2004-03-17 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi again, > > spent a few moments going over the docs in the manual re: exception > > handling. for some reason it just doesn't seem to be sinking in, as > > nothing i've tried as of yet has managed to stop prog from crashing when > > data in input that's of a different type than program is expect

Re: [fpc-pascal]exception handling

2004-03-16 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Subject: [fpc-pascal]exception handling > spent a few moments going over the docs in the manual re: exception > handling. for some reason it just doesn't seem to be sinking in, as > nothing i've tried as of yet has managed to stop prog from crashing when > data in input that's of a different type

Re: [fpc-pascal]Bug or not Bug

2004-03-11 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, > > I'm having trouble using Round: > > - [ BOF: test.pas ] - > > Program Test ; > > Uses > > Math, SysUtils ; > > > > Var > > i : Byte ; > > Begin > > For i := 0 to 31 do > > WriteLn(Format('%d %.8x',[i,Round(Ldexp(1,i))])) ; > > End. > > - [ EOF: test.pas ] - >

Re: [fpc-pascal]feature request: enhanced "pos"

2004-03-06 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, > Dunno if this is the right place to post such a message, but here goes... I think you're completely right... > > I would love to see a "pos" function that takes an additional parameter, being the position in the string where it >should START scanning. e.g.: > > my_str = 'Hello, everybo

Re: [fpc-pascal]inherited keyword

2003-12-21 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, > > Can someone explain the semantic difference between *1 and *2 please? > > > > procedure A(p: Type1); > > begin > > inherited; // *1 > > inherited A(p); // *2 > > end; > > > > ? > > 1: supporting a delphi bug > 2: as you expect > > Well, the comment to 1 isn't completly true: In met

Re: [fpc-pascal]ansistring and fillchar

2003-12-10 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, > How can I use fillchar to give an ansistring a value of, say > 'x'? In other words, I want to create a string that contains > only a single character, that is repeated a certain number of times. E.g. this should work (with some typecasting ;-): {$MODE DELPHI} var s : AnsiSt

Re: [fpc-pascal]EOF function

2003-09-11 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, > The following (attached) is a programming problem I've implemented. > Now I know the way I've done the EOF test is not correct, otherwise it > would not crash with a runtime error of 106. It doesn't crash here as long as only valid integers are entered. The doc for RTE 106 reads: "Invalid n

Re: [fpc-pascal]several questions

2003-09-11 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, >Can you only have 2 files open with FP? As above, I fixed my problem > with opening the third file by closing another, and only having 2 open at > once. My config.sys has "FILES=20", so it's not a DOS limitation by the > look of it (unless my FP program is opening up another 18 related sy

Re: [fpc-pascal]BIOS PnP function far call (go32v2)

2003-09-09 Thread Thomas Schatzl
[Note that I did a copy&paste from the list archives because the mail address I am subscribed to this list isn't working properly atm. I switched to another, but this means I couldn't reply to the original posting and so message threading is broken. Sorry.] Hi, >under GO32V2 i want to call BIOS P

Re: [fpc-pascal]class variable

2003-04-04 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, > Great! > But does -St also contain the parameters of -S2/-Sd? > Or can we use them at > them at the same time? "fpc -St -Sd aaa.pp"? Yes you can. Regards, Thomas ___ fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailma

Re: [fpc-pascal]How to set focus to graph window?

2003-03-13 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, although others have already pointed out a few solutions, here're my two cents... > I'm using the graph unit to provide graphing capabilities for my program > (Win 32 platform). The graph window opens as a separate window, which is > ok for me - except one point: The graph window gets opene

Re: [fpc-pascal]CPU rel2rev23 uploaded

2003-02-13 Thread Thomas Schatzl
From: "Thomas Schatzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 2:01 PM Subject: [fpc-pascal]CPU rel2rev23 uploaded > > [CPU rel2rev23 update announcement...] > As usual forgot to mention the most important thing, the URLs... http://members.yline.com/~to

[fpc-pascal]CPU rel2rev23 uploaded

2003-02-13 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, just updated my CPU package to rel2rev23. No breathtaking news, just a plain simple update: - added a new field to the TCPUInfo record which contains the number of logical processors if Hyperthreading enabled (e.g. P4 only). - bugfixes for Cyrix processor capabilities (hope they're correct

Re: [fpc-pascal]Classes/Objects/Pointers / Pointer Help

2003-02-10 Thread Thomas Schatzl
From: "Matt Emson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 3:41 PM Subject: RE: [fpc-pascal]Classes/Objects/Pointers / Pointer Help > RE: Dynamic arrays, What about using the Tcollection? Is there any > dis-advantage? I know a lot of TP Programmers swear by them. No, if you mean the

Re: [fpc-pascal]Classes/Objects/Pointers / Pointer Help

2003-02-10 Thread Thomas Schatzl
From: "James Mills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 2:04 PM Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]Classes/Objects/Pointers / Pointer Help Hi, > Yes ok, fair enough, this much is in my knowledge of Pascal :) hehe, but > the real question is, how do you create these objects on the fly in a >

[OT?] Valgrind profiling Was: Re: [fpc-pascal]Performance testing of FPC programs?

2003-02-08 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hi, well, I read something interesting here so I thought I could write a few lines. Since I don't have the previous mails anymore and the maillist archives (http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal ?) don't seem to work I hope I'm not missing the discussion point way too much...