> OK, I lurred myself by taking words too literally. I thought "virtual" meant
> unimplemented, to be implemented in sub-classes.
unimplemented = abstract virtual method
type
something = class
procedure do_something; virtual; abstract;
end;
_
On Sat, 29 May 2010 16:54:44 -0700
Andrew Hall wrote:
> On 29 May 10, at 15:26 , spir ☣ wrote:
> > I cannot do that. C0 (and all classes) instances need a text method. I also
> > cannot have 2 methods (one static, one virtual) with different names. It's
> > a basic feature, always called with t
