Hi,
Many years ago when I still used Delphi, it was common in our
development team to create our own patches for various components we
used. We then placed those fixed units in a new path and add that
path to the Delphi IDE (can't remember if the new path at to be on the
top or bottom of the
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
Hi,
Many years ago when I still used Delphi, it was common in our
development team to create our own patches for various components we
used. We then placed those fixed units in a new path and add
Op 2010-06-17 10:39, Marco van de Voort het geskryf:
IIRC delphi has a equivalent of -Ur ({$IMPLICITBUILD OFF}). Were the
_original_ components compiled with that?
It's been over 7 years, so the details are a bit fuzzy. If I remember
correctly, Delphi used to like dumping all installed
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
Op 2010-06-17 10:39, Marco van de Voort het geskryf:
IIRC delphi has a equivalent of -Ur ({$IMPLICITBUILD OFF}). Were the
_original_ components compiled with that?
It's been over 7 years, so the details are a bit fuzzy. If I remember
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:51:46 +0200 (CEST)
mar...@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
Op 2010-06-17 10:39, Marco van de Voort het geskryf:
IIRC delphi has a equivalent of -Ur ({$IMPLICITBUILD OFF}). Were the
_original_ components
Op 2010-06-17 10:51, Marco van de Voort het geskryf:
Well, it is hard to implement fuzzy details :-)
:-) I was simply asking if somebody tried that with Free Pascal - it wasn't
meant as a feature request.
Were it third party or components that come with Delphi that you replaced?
I believe
Op 2010-06-17 11:13, Mattias Gaertner het geskryf:
If only the unit implementation changes, and you don't use inlines and
you compile the unit with the same compiler flags, can this ppu be used
instead of the original?
Yes, that's the point I'm trying to make. When we did this years ago in
Op 2010-06-17 11:13, Mattias Gaertner het geskryf:
If only the unit implementation changes, and you don't use inlines and
you compile the unit with the same compiler flags, can this ppu be used
instead of the original?
It worked! For implementation sections bug fixes at least. :-)
Below
In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said:
If your project then included a new *.pas files with earlier unit search
path pointing to that new *.pas, it would recompile it and its *.dcu will
be generated inside your project's output path, thus used instead of the
original one in
Op 2010-06-17 11:13, Mattias Gaertner het geskryf:
If only the unit implementation changes, and you don't use inlines and
you compile the unit with the same compiler flags, can this ppu be used
instead of the original?
So far so good. I managed to successfully replace ibconnection.pas which
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
If only the unit implementation changes, and you don't use inlines and
you compile the unit with the same compiler flags, can this ppu be used
instead of the original?
So far so good. I managed to successfully replace ibconnection.pas
Op 2010-06-17 12:01, Marco van de Voort het geskryf:
Of a snapshot or of a release?
FPC 2.4.1 fixes branch from repository. Compiled two weeks ago with the
following script.
---
#!/bin/bash
COMPILER=/opt/fpc_2.4.1/x86_64-linux/bin/ppcx64
cd src
make all PP=$COMPILER
On 2010-06-17 12:14, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Op 2010-06-17 10:51, Marco van de Voort het geskryf:
Well, it is hard to implement fuzzy details :-)
:-) I was simply asking if somebody tried that with Free Pascal - it wasn't
meant as a feature request.
Were it third party or
The solution that I use is to rename the unit slightly, like I am
improving OpenSSL.pas, so I renamed it to MyOpenSSL.pas to avoid
conflicts. Once the changes are merged and released I will rename my
uses clauses back to OpenSSL.
Can be very annoying if the problem involves lot's of units, but
14 matches
Mail list logo
