John Youngquist wrote:
Interesting response.
I routinely implement large systems on the 8051 chip in assembly language
which I can write faster than Pascal. Assembly is a minimum of 500%
faster than
C on the 8051. I hate C anyway.
The machine is a pick place machine designed to assemble SMT
Hi: I have been using FPC for some time now and think it is a great
system.
I am facing a challenging port of a Borland Pascal 7 program to FPC. It
is about
8000 lines long. While most of it is ordinary and will compile easily it
uses some
features and extensions which I don't know how
John Youngquist wrote:
I would like to port the program as is, but eventually get a PCI 48
I/O line card to escape
the ISA bus and also talk USB as well. Getting it to run on later
versions of Windows might
be useful. This program controls a machine on a single purpose
computer. Windows is
Interesting response.
I routinely implement large systems on the 8051 chip in assembly language
which I can write faster than Pascal. Assembly is a minimum of 500%
faster than
C on the 8051. I hate C anyway.
The machine is a pick place machine designed to assemble SMT
circuit boards. It was
John Youngquist schrieb:
Interesting response.
I routinely implement large systems on the 8051 chip in assembly language
which I can write faster than Pascal. Assembly is a minimum of 500%
faster than
C on the 8051. I hate C anyway.
FPC runs also on embedded arm systems so this might be
