Re: [fpc-pascal] Do I need to make fpc 3.0.0 twice?

2016-01-12 Thread Sven Barth
Am 13.01.2016 00:53 schrieb "Peter" : > But what about optimising the RTL to -O4? > > I did a separate pass to build the RTL with -O4 which 2.64 does not > support. I found it makes a useful difference to the execution speed of > some programs. There is a variant of the

Re: [fpc-pascal] Do I need to make fpc 3.0.0 twice?

2016-01-12 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said: > There is a variant of the OPT parameter that applies options only for the > last compilation. This way you can use options that the compiling compiler > does not yet support. Now if I'd only remember that... -.- (for cross > compilation one can use

Re: [fpc-pascal] Do I need to make fpc 3.0.0 twice?

2016-01-12 Thread Peter
On 10/01/16 15:35, Jonas Maebe wrote: > On 10/01/16 16:22, Bo Berglund wrote: >> I always use the make all command via the Makefile. >> So do I read you right that the Makefile compiles the compiler twice, >> once using the seed compiler and then using the thus created compiler? > > It compiles

Re: [fpc-pascal] Do I need to make fpc 3.0.0 twice?

2016-01-10 Thread Bo Berglund
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:35:43 +0100, Jonas Maebe wrote: >On 10/01/16 16:22, Bo Berglund wrote: >> I always use the make all command via the Makefile. >> So do I read you right that the Makefile compiles the compiler twice, >> once using the seed compiler and then using

[fpc-pascal] Do I need to make fpc 3.0.0 twice?

2016-01-08 Thread Bo Berglund
I downloaded the release tag of fpc 3.0.0 via svn and built it using the 2.6.4 seed compiler. It seems to work OK. But now I got to thinking: Should I make fpc 3.0.0 once more using the newly created fpc 3.0.0? Will there be some difference between the two 3.0.0 versions if I do? -- Bo