Am 13.01.2016 00:53 schrieb "Peter" :
> But what about optimising the RTL to -O4?
>
> I did a separate pass to build the RTL with -O4 which 2.64 does not
> support. I found it makes a useful difference to the execution speed of
> some programs.
There is a variant of the
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
> There is a variant of the OPT parameter that applies options only for the
> last compilation. This way you can use options that the compiling compiler
> does not yet support. Now if I'd only remember that... -.- (for cross
> compilation one can use
On 10/01/16 15:35, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 10/01/16 16:22, Bo Berglund wrote:
>> I always use the make all command via the Makefile.
>> So do I read you right that the Makefile compiles the compiler twice,
>> once using the seed compiler and then using the thus created compiler?
>
> It compiles
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:35:43 +0100, Jonas Maebe
wrote:
>On 10/01/16 16:22, Bo Berglund wrote:
>> I always use the make all command via the Makefile.
>> So do I read you right that the Makefile compiles the compiler twice,
>> once using the seed compiler and then using
I downloaded the release tag of fpc 3.0.0 via svn and built it using
the 2.6.4 seed compiler. It seems to work OK.
But now I got to thinking:
Should I make fpc 3.0.0 once more using the newly created fpc 3.0.0?
Will there be some difference between the two 3.0.0 versions if I do?
--
Bo