Re: [fpc-pascal] Error format question

Am 12.04.2020 um 09:40 schrieb Sven Barth: Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal > schrieb am So., 12. Apr. 2020, 08:53: > On Apr 12, 2020, at 11:16 AM, Ryan Joseph mailto:generic...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I just did svn up and got r44689, rebuilt the

Re: [fpc-pascal] Error format question

Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am So., 12. Apr. 2020, 08:53: > > > > On Apr 12, 2020, at 11:16 AM, Ryan Joseph wrote: > > > > I just did svn up and got r44689, rebuilt the compiler but I still get > the same error format. Was it supposed to be changed? > > ok, I think we're confused here.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Error format question

> On Apr 12, 2020, at 11:16 AM, Ryan Joseph wrote: > > I just did svn up and got r44689, rebuilt the compiler but I still get the > same error format. Was it supposed to be changed? ok, I think we're confused here. Just actually tested gcc and got this format:

Re: [fpc-pascal] Error format question

> On Apr 11, 2020, at 9:50 PM, Ryan Joseph wrote: > > Thanks, I could swear this was a bug that was already fixed but I'll rebuild > the compiler tomorrow and see if it went away. I just did svn up and got r44689, rebuilt the compiler but I still get the same error format. Was it supposed

Re: [fpc-pascal] Error format question

> On Apr 11, 2020, at 8:12 PM, Florian Klämpfl wrote: > > I fixed this for trunk. You can very easily test and see what gcc outputs to > verify what's correct. Thanks, I could swear this was a bug that was already fixed but I'll rebuild the compiler tomorrow and see if it went away.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Error format question

Am 11.04.20 um 08:11 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal: Sorry to ask this yet again but I keep forgetting or remembering wrong. I thought this was a one time error that was fixed but I'm still getting different error formats with the trunk (as of today) vs 3.0.4. Can anyone please confirm

Re: [fpc-pascal] Error format question

Am 11.04.2020 um 08:11 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal: Sorry to ask this yet again but I keep forgetting or remembering wrong. I thought this was a one time error that was fixed but I'm still getting different error formats with the trunk (as of today) vs 3.0.4. Can anyone please confirm

Re: [fpc-pascal] Error format question

On Sat, 11 Apr 2020, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote: On Apr 11, 2020, at 1:17 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: My guess is you have a config file lying around that causes this to look different (-Fr option?), or you have a custom-made errore.msg file built-in. Interesting, so I

Re: [fpc-pascal] Error format question

> On Apr 11, 2020, at 1:17 PM, Michael Van Canneyt > wrote: > > My guess is you have a config file lying around that causes this to look > different (-Fr option?), or you have a custom-made errore.msg file built-in. Interesting, so I overrode the default format in the trunk somehow. I can't

Re: [fpc-pascal] Error format question

On Sat, 11 Apr 2020, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote: Sorry to ask this yet again but I keep forgetting or remembering wrong. I thought this was a one time error that was fixed but I'm still getting different error formats with the trunk (as of today) vs 3.0.4. Can anyone please confirm

[fpc-pascal] Error format question

Sorry to ask this yet again but I keep forgetting or remembering wrong. I thought this was a one time error that was fixed but I'm still getting different error formats with the trunk (as of today) vs 3.0.4. Can anyone please confirm which it the correct format I should rely on?