In our previous episode, SirStorm25 said:
>
> Nooo!
> What are these functions meant to do?
> This seems way more harder than it looks!
Well that is not that hard:
do_read - read bytes from file
do_write - write bytes to file
do_close - close file
do_erase - open file
do_rename - rename
Nooo!
What are these functions meant to do?
This seems way more harder than it looks!
Regards
SirStorm25.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FPC_HAS_FEATURE_TEXTIO---Strange-behaviour%21-tp18968260p18970979.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at
In our previous episode, SirStorm25 said:
>
> Would the OS still compile if I removed the
> syscopytodos and syscopyfromdos functions from
> the do_ procedures?
Yes of course. It wouldn't work though.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepas
Would the OS still compile if I removed the
syscopytodos and syscopyfromdos functions from
the do_ procedures?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FPC_HAS_FEATURE_TEXTIO---Strange-behaviour%21-tp18968260p18970901.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at
In our previous episode, SirStorm25 said:
>
> The only problem I've found, is that the do_ procedures contain a line of
> code:
> syscopytodos, which seems to be specific to dos, any ideas as to where
> this function is stored?
In go32v2, but they are very dos specific. Remember, this is the dos
The only problem I've found, is that the do_ procedures contain a line of
code:
syscopytodos, which seems to be specific to dos, any ideas as to where
this function is stored?
Regards
SirStorm25.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FPC_HAS_FEATURE_TEXTIO---Strange-behaviour%2
In our previous episode, SirStorm25 said:
>
> Found em!
> The finaly question is: where do I put these?
> do I create my own sysfile.inc with just these functions, or do they rely on
> other functions located within the same file?
Yes, usually per OS the porter maintains a rtl/ dir for general OS
Found em!
The finaly question is: where do I put these?
do I create my own sysfile.inc with just these functions, or do they rely on
other functions located within the same file?
Regards
SirStorm25.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FPC_HAS_FEATURE_TEXTIO---Strange-behavio
On 13 Aug 08, at 11:47, SirStorm25 wrote:
> Marco van de Voort wrote:
> >
> > In our previous episode, SirStorm25 said:
> >> Im trying to develop reading capabilities for an OS im helping to
> >> develop.
> >> When enabling the FPC_HAS_FEATURE_TEXTIO from the RTL, I get a few errors
> >> involving
In our previous episode, SirStorm25 said:
> Any ideas where to find the source to a version of DOS with those functions
> implemented, linux source code always gets me confused %-|
They are not implemented in dos but FOR dos, in the Free Pascal RTL, dos
version, dir rtl/go32v2
Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> In our previous episode, SirStorm25 said:
>> Im trying to develop reading capabilities for an OS im helping to
>> develop.
>> When enabling the FPC_HAS_FEATURE_TEXTIO from the RTL, I get a few errors
>> involving
>> the file: Text.inc.
>> All of the errors returned
In our previous episode, SirStorm25 said:
> Im trying to develop reading capabilities for an OS im helping to develop.
> When enabling the FPC_HAS_FEATURE_TEXTIO from the RTL, I get a few errors
> involving
> the file: Text.inc.
> All of the errors returned are mainly "do_" functions.
> E.g:
> do_r
Hi All!!!
Im trying to develop reading capabilities for an OS im helping to develop.
When enabling the FPC_HAS_FEATURE_TEXTIO from the RTL, I get a few errors
involving
the file: Text.inc.
All of the errors returned are mainly "do_" functions.
E.g:
do_read
do_write
do_close
do_erase
dp_rename
etc
13 matches
Mail list logo
